[w00t692]

I'd rather do it with tires i use all the time.

That way people know i can launch

 

[civic tech]

ok cool.

 

[Nemesis249MP]

I have been threadjacked, lol, get em...

 

[keefer]

Dudes, I was browsing around this guy's Flickr account. And look at this handsome fellow signing up at the gate on Honda Day:

on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

 

[Nemesis249MP]

I don't see my picture, who is this handsome guy you speak of lol

 

[SiK Enthusiast]

Nice run man. We have the exact same mod set up except for the pulleys and tires. I have a Tq Dampner and SS kit. I'm going to the track tomorrow, I'm confident to hit 13s - this thread just set it in stone for me.

(Ran 14.3 last year with JUST I/H)

 

[DartSI]

not bad. some of you guys are running the same times of stock cobalt ss/ tc's. the fastest stock cobalt ss/ tc time in the 1/4 is 13.53 or something like that. to do that n/a is pretty awesome. especially when theres no tune involved.

i wonder how much faster ppl would be with kpro as opposed to flashpro. if u could use it.

 

[w00t692]

it is a crappy header. But for the stock tuned cam angles it's ideal.

once you get tuned, it's not a good header and is way too restrictive.


Just because your car is fast with a dcrh doesn't mean someone elses is.

My car only trapped 94 mph in low humidity 60 degree weather when i had i/h/e and no tuning.

I cut 2.28 60 fts and only ran 15 flat...

After i got tuned it was like night and day went from running 15 flat to 14.1... @ 100

 

[SiK Enthusiast]

not bad. some of you guys are running the same times of stock cobalt ss/ tc's. the fastest stock cobalt ss/ tc time in the 1/4 is 13.53 or something like that. to do that n/a is pretty awesome. especially when theres no tune involved.

i wonder how much faster ppl would be with kpro as opposed to flashpro. if u could use it.

I plan on getting FlashPro but only after I'm finished with pulleys, and cams.

 

[SiK Enthusiast]

it is a crappy header. But for the stock tuned cam angles it's ideal.

once you get tuned, it's not a good header and is way too restrictive.


Just because your car is fast with a dcrh doesn't mean someone elses is.

My car only trapped 94 mph in low humidity 60 degree weather when i had i/h/e and no tuning.

I cut 2.28 60 fts and only ran 15 flat...

After i got tuned it was like night and day went from running 15 flat to 14.1... @ 100

That's a first I ever heard any complaints for the dcrh on the track.
But you are right though when it comes to tuning. I'm selling mine and getting Kidd Racing

 

[civic tech]

it is a crappy header. But for the stock tuned cam angles it's ideal.

once you get tuned, it's not a good header and is way too restrictive.


Just because your car is fast with a dcrh doesn't mean someone elses is.

My car only trapped 94 mph in low humidity 60 degree weather when i had i/h/e and no tuning.

I cut 2.28 60 fts and only ran 15 flat...

After i got tuned it was like night and day went from running 15 flat to 14.1... @ 100

thats just because you are a noob!