Ryouko said:Okay, stupid question, I'm. The car is built to run on low grade gas. Will premium/higher octane help or hurt the engine? Please advise, guys!
palindrome said:Just about everyone will say that if Honda says to use regular unleaded (87 octane), using premium is a wast of money. It shouldn't hurt anything though.
Texan06 said:I burn th 87 for 2 tanks then 1 tank of 93 from Shell because there are some extra cleaners and such which help maintain the fuel system.
Interesting. But unfortunately I'm going from a Legend to an Si...won't make a difference on my wallet like some of you guys.palindrome said:Using an octane that is too low can cause pre-ignition (knocking/pinging). This means the combustion is occurring too soon in the compression cycle. That is, the piston is on its way up in the cylinder when combustion (prematurely) occurs. Obviously this is not good for the engine. This is usually caused when using a low octane gas in a high-compression engine.
Some engines have knock sensors that actually detect pre-ignition knock and adjust the engine timing to reduce or eliminate it. This usually results in reduced engine performance.
I think most everyone agrees that using a higher octane than is required does NOT give you better MPG. You're just wasting money on gas that is more expensive than you need.
Bottom line: Use the octane rating that is recommended by the car manufacturer. (Unless of course you have modified the engine).
Texan06 said:I burn th 87 for 2 tanks then 1 tank of 93 from Shell because there are some extra cleaners and such which help maintain the fuel system.
skittleslegend said:interesting thread. It's reverse if you have a premium-requiring tank. Running 87 or lower than premium will, overtime, increase build-up and all that nasty crap in the engine. Initially, it will slightly lower your mileage per tank and um...something else, but I'm having a brain fart. I would think running premium would actually help a non-premium car, in terms of gas mileage, etc?
wickett said:this is awsome, cuase ive been paying out the ass for gas my car requires 93 oct. no less... so looks like the civic is gunna save my wallet
civicdude06 said:There is an article I think at TOV that says the Civic doesn't need anything higher than 87, however the car sometimes knocks at a low idle so a higher octane may help with that. They also mentioned about buying cheaper gas versus brand name gas and the detergents in gasoline. I'm not going to explain the whole thing here but it's a good article to read if your going to run your car to 200,000 miles.
hmmm..interesting, than i guess the cleaners of the premium gas of shell must have a little "kick to it" because when i use the the higher octane from shell, and shell only, i feel a greater kick to my car....jus my experience...Jrfish007 said:Federal law in the US prevents a station or company to put different amounts of cleaners in fuels that are dispensed via the same nozzle.
What this means is that if the gas station has only one nozzle to dispense all the grades of gas, they all MUST have the same cleaners in them regardless of grade. Only if the station has different nozzels for EVERY grade of gas, can they have different amount of cleaners/detergents in the different grades of gas. If you believe Shell has better cleaners in their 93 octane, their 87 has the same because of Federal law.
wlfkaw said:Is it only the V-Power grade of Shell that has these extra detergents? Or is it all grades?
I did notice that the TopTier site mentions all grades must meet the higher standards. In which case, what's up with V-Power? Just a higher octane?