ne one got a guess on tq #?
does anyone know the scientific reason hodas have such low tq??
does anyone know the scientific reason hodas have such low tq??
DeezV604 said:ne one got a guess on tq #?
does anyone know the scientific reason hodas have such low tq??
that defiantely the specs?2fast4u2 said:197 bhp @ 7800 rpm
139 lb-ft @ 6200 rpm
DeezV604 said:that defiantely the specs?
why is tq so low?
almost all other manufactures can get a car to have the same amount of tq as hp..
hondas neva do, anyone know why?
displacement makes torque, hp is made by intelligenceDeezV604 said:that defiantely the specs?
why is tq so low?
almost all other manufactures can get a car to have the same amount of tq as hp..
hondas neva do, anyone know why?
thanks02boostlessVIC said:displacement makes torque, hp is made by intelligence
some others to compare
acura rsx-s 2.0l 210hp 141tq
ford focus 2.0l 136hp 133tq
scion tc 2.4l 160hp 163tq
acura tsx 2.4l 200hp 166tq
NOW do you see how THEY stack up i think 140tq for a 2.0l n/a engine is great honda makes far more horsepower than any of the cars in it's class
rsx-s would win by far, torque matters yes but horsepower is more important in this case rsx-s 1/4 mile- 14.8 sec tc 1/4 mile- 15.7 sec but then scion weighs 3000lbs and rsx about 2800lbs so many things come into consideration but almost always more horsepower means fasterDeezV604 said:thanks
so looking at those specs, what would win from a total stop, a rsx-s or a tc?
like in a drag race?
im not to smart when it comes to cars as far as specs and shyt, but i do know that tq matters alot from a stop...??
what new thread?shoptb said:see new thread
I think this is what thread they were talking about.DeezV604 said:what new thread?
o thats my other thread, LOL!2fast4u2 said: