8thCivic.com

Go Back   8th Generation Honda Civic Forum > Civic Technical > Suspension and Brakes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2008, 12:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
deltatechx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 315
iTrader: 0 / 0%
better mpg after lowering?

Has anyone noticed an increase in fuel economy after lowering their 8th gen? I saw this on eibach's website:

Eibach Springs - Performance Suspension, Lowering Springs, Shocks, Sway Bars, Coil-Overs and Wheel Spacers!

I know it's only 3 mpg, but that's with "spirited" driving. I'm hoping that under normal driving conditions the mpg would increase by at least 6 mpg. Again, that may not seem like much but when you use 20 gallons of fuel a day it adds up quickly (about a $53 savings per week @ $3.60/gal), it would easily pay for itself within a month, including the camber kits. So if anyone has actually kept track of their mpg since before they lowered their civic till after, please post if there was any change in mpg (increased OR decreased).

Thanx -- Paul
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
deltatechx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 02:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
deltatechx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 315
iTrader: 0 / 0%

bump for any help on this, I've done a search and haven't found any threads pertaining to this.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
deltatechx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 02:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
Supreme Pizza!
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Azusa, CA
Age: 25
Posts: 11,938
iTrader: 5 / 100%
I can *sort of* see why lowering the car would help with MPG, but I don't think 6mpg is viable and even 3mpg appears to be pushing it.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Izzy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 12:27 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 129
Paul Gittelman
iTrader: 0 / 0%
That seems rather impossible, i'd have to go ahead and say no, maybe its the way you drive now, but lowering your car did not and will not increase your fuel economy.
-Paul
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Monsterbishi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 01:40 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Chyna Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 30
Posts: 379
John
iTrader: 0 / 0%
I am going to have to say no as well!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Chyna Black is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 02:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arcadia
Posts: 100
iTrader: 1 / 100%
maybe you get better mileage now because you take it easier over bumps instead of just driving through it in .. lol
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Mcgruber is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 03:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NorCal
Age: 23
Posts: 2,120
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzy View Post
I can *sort of* see why lowering the car would help with MPG, but I don't think 6mpg is viable and even 3mpg appears to be pushing it.
I'm with you on that, I can see that lowering your car can reduce underbody turbulence (drag) and create smoother airflow overall (more effective at higher speeds). But no way that can achieve an increase of 3mpg... I'm guessing more like fractions of 1 mpg here. If lowering your car did that much, Civic Hybrids would be slammed to the floor!

Last edited by habitat; 05-14-2008 at 03:20 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
habitat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 03:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Supreme Pizza!
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Azusa, CA
Age: 25
Posts: 11,938
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Yeah, the test was with a TRUCK, which sits high in the first place, so reducing drag would be easier with it than with a car like ours already.

Our cars are fairly smooth under-body, too, so I still can't imagine this making too much of an impact.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Izzy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 04:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
buurner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Memphis,TN
Age: 21
Posts: 330
iTrader: 3 / 100%
interesting!!!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
buurner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 04:28 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Alhambra
Age: 21
Posts: 123
MIC.
iTrader: 2 / 100%
interesting indeed...bump
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
M1C. MON5T3R is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 05:41 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Age: 30
Posts: 714
Dave
iTrader: 2 / 100%
I saw a *slight* increase on my previous '00 Accord Coupe when I dropped it on Pro-Kits. On highway trips while cruising at 65 mph or greater it was probably on the order of 1-2 MPG. Keep in mind that this was a car with underbody aerodynamics that are inferior to the current Civic and the drop was 1.5" which is more than the Pro-Kit drops the Civic (I believe). I'd expect to see an improvement since you are reducing frontal area but something less than the 1-2 MPG I saw on my Accord.

1 MPG (say from 30 to 31 MPG) over 100,000 miles at $4/gal would save you about $400. Not huge, but a good way to justify lowering your car to your wife!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
OrdnanceMarine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:46 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
deltatechx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 315
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
That seems rather impossible, i'd have to go ahead and say no, maybe its the way you drive now, but lowering your car did not and will not increase your fuel economy.
-Paul
I never said I lowered my car or that it would give better fuel mileage, I'm asking if anyone has experienced first hand what Eibach claims on the linked page.

Quote:
Yeah, the test was with a TRUCK, which sits high in the first place, so reducing drag would be easier with it than with a car like ours already.

Our cars are fairly smooth under-body, too, so I still can't imagine this making too much of an impact.
I was actually referring to the Honda Accord on the bottom half of the page, guess I should have specified that.


Thanx for your input, I figured it wouldn't be that drastic of a change but I just wanted some input from people that have lowered their 8th gens and could give a definite yes or no on the increased fuel economy from their own experience and not theory or claims from the manufacturers.

Thanx again
- Paul
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
deltatechx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 05:36 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NorCal
Age: 23
Posts: 2,120
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrdnanceMarine View Post
I saw a *slight* increase on my previous '00 Accord Coupe when I dropped it on Pro-Kits. On highway trips while cruising at 65 mph or greater it was probably on the order of 1-2 MPG. Keep in mind that this was a car with underbody aerodynamics that are inferior to the current Civic and the drop was 1.5" which is more than the Pro-Kit drops the Civic (I believe). I'd expect to see an improvement since you are reducing frontal area but something less than the 1-2 MPG I saw on my Accord.

1 MPG (say from 30 to 31 MPG) over 100,000 miles at $4/gal would save you about $400. Not huge, but a good way to justify lowering your car to your wife!
The problem with your reasoning is that it is hard to prove that lowering your car = MPG increase from other random natural factors. They include, changes in weather (both heat/cold and rain/dry), variation in fuel quality, differences in drive setting, and also human judgment/error. All these factors can alter your MPG by 1 or 2 points, therefore it is impossible to say "lowering my car increased my MPG by 1-2 points" without increasing the sample to normalize the distribution.

Last edited by habitat; 05-15-2008 at 05:38 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
habitat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 04:16 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Age: 30
Posts: 714
Dave
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by habitat View Post
The problem with your reasoning is that it is hard to prove that lowering your car = MPG increase from other random natural factors. They include, changes in weather (both heat/cold and rain/dry), variation in fuel quality, differences in drive setting, and also human judgment/error. All these factors can alter your MPG by 1 or 2 points, therefore it is impossible to say "lowering my car increased my MPG by 1-2 points" without increasing the sample to normalize the distribution.
True, there's no way to beyond a doubt attribute any change in MPG to any modification unless you had a way to track variables and essentially remove the "noise" from your data. What I did do is looked back on my fueling log that covers the entire history of said vehicle. I swapped springs in July, 2001 at about 13000 miles which is about the hottest it gets in Prescott, AZ and was plenty of time to break the car in. During this period of time my driving routine was very consistent. Drive to the university in the morning, drive to the flightline after class in the afternoon, drive across town to work after that, drive home, repeat. Much of this was at 55-65 mph and any excursions from this schedule can be assumed to be relatively random and normalized over the course of 8 months. Any variations due to weather conditions, whether seasonal or diurnal, can basically be canceled out since the period I'm looking at was April-November. Fuel should have been fairly consistent since I always fueled at the local Costco and I'm unsure if there was any change in the fuel blend in rural Arizona during the year but I'm sure they wouldn't be doing the shift in July.

Anyway, I'm probably more methodical that most folks WRT this topic, at least I hope so since it's essentially part of what I do for a living so you're welcome to take or leave my simple analysis. What I do see in my log (which I track at Fuel Economy) is an awful lot of 36.X MPG tanks and a few 34.X and 35.X tanks and a high of 38.7. Post 1.5" drop I see a bunch of 37.X MPG tanks a few 38.X MPG tanks and a high of 40.0 MPG.

Again, you're right, I can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that dropping my Accord 1.5" yielded ANY improvement but I came to the conclusion that it did based on some sort of somewhat creditable procedures and didn't just use the “anal extraction” method to gather my numbers and conclusion.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
OrdnanceMarine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Perhaps they considered the decreased unsprung weight as well? How much lighter are the Eibachs than the stock stuff?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
madmatt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:38 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
24boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 903
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Possibly because lowering the car also changes overall aerodynamic characteristics. Either lower front or lower rear, change in down force with less air flowing underneith the car. OR it's all in your head.

I know I get GREAT gas mileage now with turbo only because power comes in so soon I don't need to push it to get the car going.

Last edited by 24boosted; 05-18-2008 at 01:40 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
24boosted is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:49 AM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
Toys For Tots
 
GALAXY~SI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chester NY
Age: 19
Posts: 11,535
Kurt
iTrader: 16 / 100%
is this serious i cant believe they said lol
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
GALAXY~SI is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 02:59 AM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
07 fg2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 274
iTrader: 1 / 100%
i do drive slower on side streets due to my hfps. maybe people are driving slower to avoid potholes and harsh ride.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
07 fg2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 09:56 PM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 35
iTrader: 0 / 0%
no way
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
NASAMike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 10:08 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mrbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 404
iTrader: 1 / 100%
There's no question that lowering the car decreases drag (and lift).

If you've got a Sedan, putting the undercovers from the Hybrid will decrease drag for far less money. (Still would love to know if they'd fit on the Coupe.)

The only question is how much it will help MPG. Without more details on the "high-performance testing/driving" you won't know.

Bottom line - if you are considering lowering your car to help your MPG, there are better places to spend your money first. But if want to lower your car and you want to know if it will help or hurt your MPG, it'll help.

-mr. bill
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
mrbill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2006 MPG=30/40, 2008 MPG=25/34.......WTF happened? LsedanX Civic Coupe And Sedan 35 12-11-2007 09:13 AM
How to find your MPG pks17 Civic Coupe And Sedan 11 11-27-2007 07:10 PM
Is this the first car where A/T MPG > M/T MPG? asndragonboii Civic Coupe And Sedan 6 01-19-2007 05:08 PM
about MPG tigerwooxx Civic Coupe And Sedan 3 10-29-2006 09:12 AM
whats up with my MPG!? venge Garage 38 01-02-2006 09:52 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
copyright 8thcivic.com - all rights reserved