8thCivic.com

Go Back   8th Generation Honda Civic Forum > Civic Technical > Suspension and Brakes

Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2007, 02:11 PM   #201 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,689
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Correct. It will be an acutal improvment in performance rather than a percieved one.
Highrev1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 02:18 PM   #202 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
zenith931's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redford, MI
Age: 25
Posts: 2,423
Yes, I AM A WOMAN!
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highrev1
Correct. It will be an acutal improvment in performance rather than a percieved one.
Cool, you're gonna save me some money, too by only getting the rear!
zenith931 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 10:23 AM   #203 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St.Augustine, Florida
Age: 37
Posts: 325
iTrader: 0 / 0%
I still feel that unless you are driving at the limit, having both makes the car much more solid and controlled while still feeling fairly neutral. The setup must be fairly well balanced if it comes from Honda on the Si! If you are tuning for oversteer, then by all means stick with the rear, or put the Si sway on front and a thicker aftermarket on the rear. For my normal daily "spirited" driving, having Si front and rear has worked really well.

This thread could go on forever...........
tegrady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 10:48 AM   #204 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
zenith931's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redford, MI
Age: 25
Posts: 2,423
Yes, I AM A WOMAN!
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by tegrady
I still feel that unless you are driving at the limit, having both makes the car much more solid and controlled while still feeling fairly neutral. The setup must be fairly well balanced if it comes from Honda on the Si! If you are tuning for oversteer, then by all means stick with the rear, or put the Si sway on front and a thicker aftermarket on the rear. For my normal daily "spirited" driving, having Si front and rear has worked really well.

This thread could go on forever...........
All I'm aiming for is to make my car a little more confident and planted in my daily drives. I'm not looking for autox handling or anything.
zenith931 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 01:10 PM   #205 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 22
iTrader: 0 / 0%
sways

i agree with tegrady.. i put both on mine, and quite enjoy the balanced feel.

initially, i only installed the rear one (it was easier with my jack/ramps) and drove for about a week on it, and found it made quite a difference. it was such a thrill to 'feel' the rear end respond when i threw it into a high-speed corner (again, nothing stupid, just spirited driving).

once i put the front in, it wasnt as dramatic a difference, but definitely felt more planted in the front, especially if corners were going to be bumpy..

imo, for the money you spend, its a cheap upgrade, and doing both really makes me appreciate my car that much more!
nindustrial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 02:00 PM   #206 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,689
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by tegrady
I still feel that unless you are driving at the limit, having both makes the car much more solid and controlled while still feeling fairly neutral. The setup must be fairly well balanced if it comes from Honda on the Si! If you are tuning for oversteer, then by all means stick with the rear, or put the Si sway on front and a thicker aftermarket on the rear. For my normal daily "spirited" driving, having Si front and rear has worked really well.
This thread could go on forever...........
Neutral??? Do a search for neutral it doesn't exist. Its not balanced by ANY MEANS it is heavily biased towards the front. I am not saying tune to oversteer but just tune out some understeer.

THe thread shouldn't go on for ever, there are facts to tuning a suspension. If you want to be faster and more confident then there are things that work and there AREN"T. While maintaining the stock front sized bar and increasing the rear the car is still controll.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nindustrial
i put both on mine, and quite enjoy the balanced feel

once i put the front in, it wasnt as dramatic a difference, but definitely felt more planted in the front, especially if corners were going to be bumpy..
You know guys before you go making these uneducated statments why not read a little, THere is a great suspension sticky at the top of the page that will absoutly start you in the right direction.

If it did anything it gave you a less balanced feel even more heavily biased towards the front of the vechile.

As far as it feeling more planted over bumpy surfaces that is an ABSOLUTE falsity....

"Let me start with the higher the suspension frequency grip decreases. SO WHAT? Well this frequencey is a measure of how many cyles per minute or in a second, the car would go through and bounce up and down on springs alone. This matters greatly to you because the stiffer the suspenion is the less contact pactch will be touching the ground over rough surfaces, and if the tires in the air your not gaining traction or grip. The more grip your tires can make, the more force your putting into the car so you will need to up the resistance to body roll to keep it at an acceptable level. Race tires need a much stiffer suspension than a street tire. Cause their grip is that much higher and will cause the body to roll, losing camber and reducing grip.
In simpler terms...you want to run the softest springs you can get away with that reduces body roll to an Livable level, and has an approperate roll couple balance to give you the oversteer/understeer charateristics you want with the most grip your car can achieve."
Highrev1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 03:24 PM   #207 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St.Augustine, Florida
Age: 37
Posts: 325
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highrev1
Neutral??? Do a search for neutral it doesn't exist.
Huhh?!?!? So I used the wrong term. No need to get excited, just offering the results that I saw with my car.

I thought I was pretty clear that all of my statements were based on feel (Butt-Dyno) and I don't Auto-X or drive close to the limit. You're acting like it's a completely idiotic move when it's not. It's not like we're talking about a $2,000 mod that's going to ruin the car. My opinion is to spend the $200 or less and see how you like it with each setup. If anything, you remove the front and you're out $80 that you can probably get back on eBay.

Nevermind... Do whatever makes you happy. I'm done.
tegrady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 05:08 PM   #208 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,689
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by tegrady
You're acting like it's a completely idiotic move when it's not. My opinion is to spend the $200 or less and see how you like it with each setup. If anything, you remove the front and you're out $80 that you can probably get back on eBay.
Sorry If I came off in an innapproprate way. Its not an idiotic move....we aren't talking about a huge difference between the two bars 25 to 27mm If I rember correctly. With that said any additional Roll-couple distribution to the front of this car would decrease potential handling, that is all I was trying to say
Highrev1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 08:25 PM   #209 (permalink)
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vacaville CA
Age: 27
Posts: 5,578
Paul
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Maybe i could help explain what Revy is trying to say. First, let me give you some perspective on where Revy is coming from. Revy comes from a world of racing. Racing is done on/at the limit. Tegrady, from your statements, it seems that you don't drive at the limit of the car. If you did drive at the limit of the car, you would have noticed that the stiffer front bar makes the car push (understeer) more causing it to be less balanced. At the limit of any car, the end of the car that has the stiffer suspension realitive to the weight it carries (roll-couple distribution) will lose traction first. So in a fwd car, the front end has more weight to carry than the rear. So the more you stiffen the front suspension, the sooner the car will lose traction at the front of the car. If you stiffen the rear suspension, the rear end will lose traction sooner, than it used to causing some oversteer.

If you dont drive at the limit, the stiffer front bar will cause the car to have better turn in which can make the car feel more balanced when it really isn't. If you want a front wheel drive car to have quantitatively (measureble) better handling, you need to increase the stiffness of the rear end relitive to the front. So when you add a stiffer rear bar AND a stiffer front bar, you haven't changed the balance in the stiffness of the suspension.

Honda designs the Si to push (have understeer) from the factory even though honda knows that a car with more oversteer (to a point) will handle better and put up better numbers on the track. The reason that they do this is because most people can't drive their way out of a wet paper sac and because most people cant drive at the limit, a car that understeers is easier to save once it is pushed past the limits. I hope this helped a little.
Sirbelch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 08:13 AM   #210 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
poizun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Great Mills, Maryland
Age: 24
Posts: 442
Dan
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbelch
Maybe i could help explain what Revy is trying to say. First, let me give you some perspective on where Revy is coming from. Revy comes from a world of racing. Racing is done on/at the limit. Tegrady, from your statements, it seems that you don't drive at the limit of the car. If you did drive at the limit of the car, you would have noticed that the stiffer front bar makes the car push (understeer) more causing it to be less balanced. At the limit of any car, the end of the car that has the stiffer suspension realitive to the weight it carries (roll-couple distribution) will lose traction first. So in a fwd car, the front end has more weight to carry than the rear. So the more you stiffen the front suspension, the sooner the car will lose traction at the front of the car. If you stiffen the rear suspension, the rear end will lose traction sooner, than it used to causing some oversteer.

If you dont drive at the limit, the stiffer front bar will cause the car to have better turn in which can make the car feel more balanced when it really isn't. If you want a front wheel drive car to have quantitatively (measureble) better handling, you need to increase the stiffness of the rear end relitive to the front. So when you add a stiffer rear bar AND a stiffer front bar, you haven't changed the balance in the stiffness of the suspension.

Honda designs the Si to push (have understeer) from the factory even though honda knows that a car with more oversteer (to a point) will handle better and put up better numbers on the track. The reason that they do this is because most people can't drive their way out of a wet paper sac and because most people cant drive at the limit, a car that understeers is easier to save once it is pushed past the limits. I hope this helped a little.


Very well said.
poizun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 09:04 AM   #211 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St.Augustine, Florida
Age: 37
Posts: 325
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbelch
Maybe i could help explain...
Thanks. I did have a decent understanding of "the stiffer end slides first" idea, obviously in much more laymen terms than you or Revy. So if I understand correctly,what I have done is made things stiffer, but kept the factory level of favoring the front, thus inducing understeer at the limit. I'm OK with that, and like the results. I have previously considered keeping the Si front and putting on an aftermarket rear, so I might try it out and see how it feels.

Again, thanks and sorry if I rubbed anyone the wrong way.
tegrady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:51 AM   #212 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 103
iTrader: 0 / 0%
For my EX coupe... which would be a better option? SI front/Progress rear or SI front/SI rear I want the best handling but at the same time I enjoy the quality of ride my car has!
dryerlint88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 12:20 PM   #213 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 135
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Have the si front and rear on sedan. Very little difference if any compared to stock sways
flsedan07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 02:06 PM   #214 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St.Augustine, Florida
Age: 37
Posts: 325
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by dryerlint88
For my EX coupe... which would be a better option? SI front/Progress rear or SI front/SI rear I want the best handling but at the same time I enjoy the quality of ride my car has!
I'd say read through the previous 21 pages and make the call.
tegrady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 02:21 PM   #215 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,689
iTrader: 1 / 100%
All I am saying is that putting thsi bars on the cars that already have less valving in their dampers is/can be a less than ideal situation.

Dampers springs and sway bars, all tune the car in different parts of the turn. SO if you are way off on what you put on you could get a car pushes coming into the turn, then is loose mid way through and out of the turn.

Dampers mainly adjust corner entry and exit, Sway bars effect mid corner adjustments....."Meaning if the car is having corner entry or exit problems you adjust the dampers, if it is having mid corner issues then you need to tweak your spring rates or anti-roll bar rates"

"The dampers influence the performance of the car Much more then anti-roll bars.. Anti-roll bars really only influence the mid corner oversteer understeer balance, where as Dampers influence not only corner entry and exit oversteer/understeer balance, but also your acceleration and braking performance as well as contribute to the general stability of the car."

Hope this helps a little
Highrev1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 02:32 PM   #216 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
honda93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Property Tax Hell... NJ
Age: 34
Posts: 911
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highrev1
All I am saying is that putting thsi bars on the cars that already have less valving in their dampers is/can be a less than ideal situation.

Dampers springs and sway bars, all tune the car in different parts of the turn. SO if you are way off on what you put on you could get a car pushes coming into the turn, then is loose mid way through and out of the turn.

Dampers mainly adjust corner entry and exit, Sway bars effect mid corner adjustments....."Meaning if the car is having corner entry or exit problems you adjust the dampers, if it is having mid corner issues then you need to tweak your spring rates or anti-roll bar rates"

"The dampers influence the performance of the car Much more then anti-roll bars.. Anti-roll bars really only influence the mid corner oversteer understeer balance, where as Dampers influence not only corner entry and exit oversteer/understeer balance, but also your acceleration and braking performance as well as contribute to the general stability of the car."

Hope this helps a little

Agreed on most things... I tend to suggest to people that if they aren't going to be pushing the car to its limits, then "beefier" swaybars will help make everyday commutes or spirited drives a little more entertaining. In certain cases, they will make the car ride rougher, especially if only one wheel hits the bump, but for the most part, swaybars are an easy way to add some spring rate to a corner without resorting to springs.

Anthony "Mario" Crea
NNJR-SCCA
honda93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 03:44 PM   #217 (permalink)
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vacaville CA
Age: 27
Posts: 5,578
Paul
iTrader: 1 / 100%
I agree with 93. As someone that has gone from just some fun on the streets, to some one that enjoyed the limit more and wanted to get into racing, I can see where both Revy and 93 are coming from. When i put a sway bar kit on my 94 GSR, It was the "best" suspension mod i (thought) put on the car because it made for a bigger change in feel than the Koni Reds and Eibach Pros i put on. But, after i got more confident with this set up and began to raise the limits of driving, i found out that the car pushed more with the thicker front aftermarket sway bar than the stock set up did. Up and until the limit however, i felt that the car was more "fun" to drive.
Sirbelch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 01:53 AM   #218 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
racerx78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 688
Daddy
iTrader: 0 / 0%
hmmmzzzz
racerx78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 02:46 PM   #219 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Crap! I think I forgot to get the brackets for the rear Bar when I ordered the other day. Are they absolutely necessary?
fleamoffitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 01:37 AM   #220 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
iTrader: 0 / 0%
thanks for this - I have a 07 EX auto- coupe that is twitchy & tends to abrupt oversteer; I'm gonna order the SI kit tonite
emoze is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/suspension-brakes/9328-si-front-rear-sways-ex-sedan.html
Posted By For Type Date
DIY/install index - LOOK HERE BEFORE ASKING FOR A DIY - 8th Generation Honda Civic Forum This thread Refback 01-19-2008 10:44 PM
Help me with my rear sway bar 2006 CSX - Page 2 - Acura CSX Forums This thread Refback 01-14-2008 10:38 PM
DIY/install index - LOOK HERE BEFORE ASKING FOR A DIY - 8th Generation Honda Civic Forum This thread Refback 01-11-2008 05:15 PM

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dumb Laws C2i0v0i1c Water Cooler 58 10-03-2008 09:27 AM
EX Sedan 60/40 Split rear seats 8civic8 Civic Coupe And Sedan 7 05-03-2006 08:57 AM
2006 Civic Summary from Temple of VTEC shoptb Driving Experience 4 01-11-2006 02:40 AM
2006 Civic sedan rear window clm10k Civic Coupe And Sedan 5 01-07-2006 03:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
copyright 8thcivic.com - all rights reserved