8thCivic.com

Go Back   8th Generation Honda Civic Forum > Civic Technical > Suspension and Brakes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2008, 11:34 PM   #61 (permalink)
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vacaville CA
Age: 27
Posts: 5,636
Paul
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Ok I'll drop the rotting because its starting to grow stuff.

You are jumping to conlusions like a stereotypical woman . I did say all the coilovers on the market are junk (even though they are, until Redshift comes out with theirs)? I'm just saying that the car is too low and no coilover can make up for bad suspension geometry (piston travel can be compensated for with different valving and a large shaft which no OTS coilover has for our cars). Anything past 1.5in is not good for our car's suspension geometry (really anything past stock is not ideal but shit really hits the fan after 1.5 in). The OP's car is way beyond that point. He has compromised both suspenison geometry and piston travel by over lowering your car. He has gained looks and nothing more.
__________________
You know what the sun's all about when the light go out.
Sirbelch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 11:38 PM   #62 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BTRobertson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 31
Posts: 685
B.T. Robertson
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbelch View Post
Ok I'll drop the rotting because its starting to grow stuff.
No worries.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbelch View Post
You are jumping to conlusions like a stereotypical woman . I did say all the coilovers on the market are junk (even though they are, until Redshift comes out with theirs)?
Okay, you did say...no problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbelch View Post
I'm just saying that the car is too low and no coilover can make up for bad suspension geometry (piston travel can be compensated for with different valving and a large shaft which no OTS coilover has for our cars). Anything past 1.5in is not good for our car's suspension geometry (really anything past stock is not ideal but shit really hits the fan after 1.5 in). The OP's car is way beyond that point. He has compromised both suspenison geometry and piston travel by over lowering your car. He has gained looks and nothing more.
He did say that he doesn't drive with the car like that, I believe. He lowers it for show/photo shoots, then raises it back up when driving. I'll let this rest now, but it'll be interesting to see what RedShift does. Nice banter...grumpy.
BTRobertson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 11:44 PM   #63 (permalink)
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vacaville CA
Age: 27
Posts: 5,636
Paul
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Ok, when I say suspension geometry, I'm referring to things like roll center, cg, camber curves, scrub radius, the Dave poing. Nothing in the car is physically changing shape. The imaginary triangles that all these point make changes the way the car handles. Not grumpy, just trying to defend my point.
__________________
You know what the sun's all about when the light go out.
Sirbelch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 11:49 PM   #64 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BTRobertson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 31
Posts: 685
B.T. Robertson
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Your original point was very attacking in nature, claiming pure superficiality instead of posing intelligent questions about physics and geometry like you are now. Kinda puts everyone on the defensive when the base statement is nothing but a sigh and an insult. Just sayin'. Nice points, though...I am researching all that stuff as we speak so I'm informed.

There are tons of other points about suspensions as well, like anti-dive, anti-squat, instant center, roll center height, air resistance, HFS (high frequency shock), etc. All of this probably plays a vital role in how suspensions are designed for any car.

I would like to see some vendors come in here and defend the claim that most/all currently offered pistons can't handle a drop at or above 1.5". Be interesting to see if/how they defend that statement. I think we all would like to know.

Last edited by BTRobertson; 04-02-2008 at 11:53 PM.
BTRobertson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 12:03 AM   #65 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BTRobertson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 31
Posts: 685
B.T. Robertson
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Wow...must read...some of it applies to off-road vehicles, but a lot of the theory and calculations are universal for suspension application. The guy's a great writer and communicator, too.

Pirate4x4.com - The largest off roading website in the world.

Last edited by BTRobertson; 04-03-2008 at 12:06 AM.
BTRobertson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 01:04 AM   #66 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
K20Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracy, CA
Age: 18
Posts: 920
Masi
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbelch View Post
Ok I'll drop the rotting because its starting to grow stuff.

You are jumping to conlusions like a stereotypical woman . I did say all the coilovers on the market are junk (even though they are, until Redshift comes out with theirs)? I'm just saying that the car is too low and no coilover can make up for bad suspension geometry (piston travel can be compensated for with different valving and a large shaft which no OTS coilover has for our cars). Anything past 1.5in is not good for our car's suspension geometry (really anything past stock is not ideal but shit really hits the fan after 1.5 in). The OP's car is way beyond that point. He has compromised both suspenison geometry and piston travel by over lowering your car. He has gained looks and nothing more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTRobertson View Post
No worries.



Okay, you did say...no problem.



He did say that he doesn't drive with the car like that, I believe. He lowers it for show/photo shoots, then raises it back up when driving. I'll let this rest now, but it'll be interesting to see what RedShift does. Nice banter...grumpy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbelch View Post
Ok, when I say suspension geometry, I'm referring to things like roll center, cg, camber curves, scrub radius, the Dave poing. Nothing in the car is physically changing shape. The imaginary triangles that all these point make changes the way the car handles. Not grumpy, just trying to defend my point.
All I know is I read SirBelches posts Im running Pro-Cs and he told me about the drop and how it would push and he was absolutely right i have my car at two finger gap and it still barely pushes but Im not willing to go any higher so Belch thanks for the comment I have to admit Im impressed and I still don't have had an alignment done and I am only at 2 clicks front and 6clicks rear!

ps. it was worse then stock that low!!!
K20Redline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 02:30 AM   #67 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
boostedLSb18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 421
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Smile

Alright guys/gals,

I made this post since people where asking about the pics/install and everything else. I didn't nor intended this to be about the ride height and how it compromises ride quality or the ability to make turns. I never did mention that everyone should have their car as low as this and drive it, nor did I mention that they should purchase this set just for the intention of slamming the car. If they were to look into purchasing a coilover set up I would ask them multiple questions so I can get an idea of what their intentions are and then based on their answers I would recommend a product that will suit their needs and they will be satisfied with their purchase.

Everything that Belch referred to is probably correct and how the car wasn't intended to sit as low, but on the other hand I didn't lower the car this low to be daily driven if driven that low. It's all for show, when I want to make the car corner on rails then I'll raise the car back up but still about 1.5"-1.75" lower than stock.

I believe it could have been worded differently and still have gotten the point across. Remember we are here with the intention on learning and not here to say who's right and who's wrong. Everyone here will have their own version of what's right and what's wrong.

So, back to the main purpose of my thread:

If anyone has any questions about the product it self, please address them here, and I will answer them to the best to my knowledge if I don't know the answer I will find out and then let you know.

Thank you have a great day.
boostedLSb18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:02 AM   #68 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BTRobertson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 31
Posts: 685
B.T. Robertson
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostedLSb18 View Post
Alright guys/gals,

I made this post since people where asking about the pics/install and everything else. I didn't nor intended this to be about the ride height and how it compromises ride quality or the ability to make turns. I never did mention that everyone should have their car as low as this and drive it, nor did I mention that they should purchase this set just for the intention of slamming the car. If they were to look into purchasing a coilover set up I would ask them multiple questions so I can get an idea of what their intentions are and then based on their answers I would recommend a product that will suit their needs and they will be satisfied with their purchase.

Everything that Belch referred to is probably correct and how the car wasn't intended to sit as low, but on the other hand I didn't lower the car this low to be daily driven if driven that low. It's all for show, when I want to make the car corner on rails then I'll raise the car back up but still about 1.5"-1.75" lower than stock.

I believe it could have been worded differently and still have gotten the point across. Remember we are here with the intention on learning and not here to say who's right and who's wrong. Everyone here will have their own version of what's right and what's wrong.

So, back to the main purpose of my thread:

If anyone has any questions about the product it self, please address them here, and I will answer them to the best to my knowledge if I don't know the answer I will find out and then let you know.

Thank you have a great day.
Well said. I wish I didn't get sucked into the conversation I had, but oh well. I think the product is great, I think it will be a purchase of mine for sure, I think Skunk2 is a great company, and I think my handling characteristics will be 100% better with a conservative ride height (which is what I would've done in the first place). Great posts boosted.
BTRobertson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:18 AM   #69 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
nighthawkblacksi07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Savannah, GA
Age: 22
Posts: 123
Brian Yeager
iTrader: 0 / 0%
so hows the ride on the pros s
nighthawkblacksi07 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 12:18 PM   #70 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
s0opa_Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Souf' Dallas
Age: 21
Posts: 1,422
M i l o
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostedLSb18 View Post
Texas, DFW area
im in the dfw area as well, i want to check your ride out sometime!
s0opa_Si is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 03:20 PM   #71 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
boostedLSb18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 421
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighthawkblacksi07 View Post
so hows the ride on the pros s
It's a little stiffer than stock, but very tolerable. I enjoy the ride.
boostedLSb18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 04:07 PM   #72 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dyno Room
Posts: 1,091
iTrader: 48 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostedLSb18 View Post
It's a little stiffer than stock, but very tolerable. I enjoy the ride.

x2.. It isn't as aggressive as those older kits.
sctuned.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 06:23 PM   #73 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FastTimesAtFGHigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: LAX-YYZ
Posts: 1,697
http://jdmfg2.blogspot.com
iTrader: 6 / 100%
are the springs progressive on these coils? like, would the ride height be obviously better at 1" drop versus 1.5"?
FastTimesAtFGHigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 06:56 PM   #74 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
boostedLSb18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 421
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastTimesAtFGHigh View Post
are the springs progressive on these coils? like, would the ride height be obviously better at 1" drop versus 1.5"?
They are linear springs.
boostedLSb18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 02:25 AM   #75 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
deuce0880's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Orrville, Ohio
Age: 18
Posts: 415
Alan
iTrader: 3 / 100%
i'm having a big problem with my rear shocks and that bushing deal. i dont wanna drive it cause i dont wanna ruin anything!!! is it safe to drive on??
deuce0880 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 09:47 AM   #76 (permalink)
Toys For Tots
 
jrotax101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Atlanta GA and Manchester, England
Age: 1
Posts: 11,314
Robert
iTrader: 3 / 100%
you need to reuse the bushes/washer/nut from your oem rear struts..
__________________


Next Project : E36 M3 boosted track car
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryryninja View Post
fawk.. if my volks were hyperblack/formula silver.. my ballz would jump out and blow my pee pee

Last edited by jrotax101; 04-04-2008 at 12:29 PM.
jrotax101 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 12:03 PM   #77 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
deuce0880's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Orrville, Ohio
Age: 18
Posts: 415
Alan
iTrader: 3 / 100%
i did but its still not tight...
deuce0880 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 12:32 PM   #78 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
deuce0880's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Orrville, Ohio
Age: 18
Posts: 415
Alan
iTrader: 3 / 100%
in the picture below it looks as if the adjuster is upside down. i talked to skunk2 and they said the adjuster should be on the bottom and the spring on top of that. correct me if i'm wrong please! i really irritated and tired right now but thanks for your help!!

2366996868_606a9c03da.jpg
deuce0880 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 01:14 PM   #79 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
boostedLSb18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 421
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by deuce0880 View Post
in the picture below it looks as if the adjuster is upside down. i talked to skunk2 and they said the adjuster should be on the bottom and the spring on top of that. correct me if i'm wrong please! i really irritated and tired right now but thanks for your help!!

Attachment 11843
The picture has the suspension installed correctly. do you have a pic of your set up so I can see what is wrong?

Thanks.
boostedLSb18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 01:18 PM   #80 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FastTimesAtFGHigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: LAX-YYZ
Posts: 1,697
http://jdmfg2.blogspot.com
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Why isn't a simple thing like instructions included with these anyhow?
FastTimesAtFGHigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
06+ Civic Skunk2 Pro-C Coilovers CorSport CorSport 37 10-30-2008 08:23 PM
Skunk2 Pro-S Coilovers : Pictures and Installation with Review sctuned.com Suspension and Brakes 70 07-09-2008 12:01 AM
Skunk2 Pro-C Coilovers test review on FG2 feichai Suspension and Brakes 97 04-21-2008 02:18 AM
Got pics of my new NHBP FA5 CapnCrunch926 Introduction & Pictures 12 12-14-2007 10:32 PM
Sexy NHBP from Seattle -- Nude pics inside! wookieloou Introduction & Pictures 20 06-14-2007 12:30 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©