![]() |
|
|
|
#61 (permalink) |
|
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
![]() |
Ok I'll drop the rotting because its starting to grow stuff.
You are jumping to conlusions like a stereotypical woman . I did say all the coilovers on the market are junk (even though they are, until Redshift comes out with theirs)? I'm just saying that the car is too low and no coilover can make up for bad suspension geometry (piston travel can be compensated for with different valving and a large shaft which no OTS coilover has for our cars). Anything past 1.5in is not good for our car's suspension geometry (really anything past stock is not ideal but shit really hits the fan after 1.5 in). The OP's car is way beyond that point. He has compromised both suspenison geometry and piston travel by over lowering your car. He has gained looks and nothing more.
__________________
You know what the sun's all about when the light go out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
|
No worries.
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) |
|
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
![]() |
Ok, when I say suspension geometry, I'm referring to things like roll center, cg, camber curves, scrub radius, the Dave poing. Nothing in the car is physically changing shape. The imaginary triangles that all these point make changes the way the car handles. Not grumpy, just trying to defend my point.
__________________
You know what the sun's all about when the light go out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Your original point was very attacking in nature, claiming pure superficiality instead of posing intelligent questions about physics and geometry like you are now. Kinda puts everyone on the defensive when the base statement is nothing but a sigh and an insult. Just sayin'. Nice points, though...I am researching all that stuff as we speak so I'm informed.
There are tons of other points about suspensions as well, like anti-dive, anti-squat, instant center, roll center height, air resistance, HFS (high frequency shock), etc. All of this probably plays a vital role in how suspensions are designed for any car. I would like to see some vendors come in here and defend the claim that most/all currently offered pistons can't handle a drop at or above 1.5". Be interesting to see if/how they defend that statement. I think we all would like to know.
Last edited by BTRobertson; 04-02-2008 at 11:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Wow...must read...some of it applies to off-road vehicles, but a lot of the theory and calculations are universal for suspension application. The guy's a great writer and communicator, too.
Pirate4x4.com - The largest off roading website in the world. Last edited by BTRobertson; 04-03-2008 at 12:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) | |||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
ps. it was worse then stock that low!!! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Alright guys/gals,
I made this post since people where asking about the pics/install and everything else. I didn't nor intended this to be about the ride height and how it compromises ride quality or the ability to make turns. I never did mention that everyone should have their car as low as this and drive it, nor did I mention that they should purchase this set just for the intention of slamming the car. If they were to look into purchasing a coilover set up I would ask them multiple questions so I can get an idea of what their intentions are and then based on their answers I would recommend a product that will suit their needs and they will be satisfied with their purchase. Everything that Belch referred to is probably correct and how the car wasn't intended to sit as low, but on the other hand I didn't lower the car this low to be daily driven if driven that low. It's all for show, when I want to make the car corner on rails then I'll raise the car back up but still about 1.5"-1.75" lower than stock. I believe it could have been worded differently and still have gotten the point across. Remember we are here with the intention on learning and not here to say who's right and who's wrong. Everyone here will have their own version of what's right and what's wrong. So, back to the main purpose of my thread: If anyone has any questions about the product it self, please address them here, and I will answer them to the best to my knowledge if I don't know the answer I will find out and then let you know. Thank you have a great day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Atlanta GA and Manchester, England
Age: 1
Posts: 11,314
Robert
iTrader: 3 / 100%
|
you need to reuse the bushes/washer/nut from your oem rear struts..
__________________
![]() Next Project : E36 M3 boosted track car Last edited by jrotax101; 04-04-2008 at 12:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
in the picture below it looks as if the adjuster is upside down. i talked to skunk2 and they said the adjuster should be on the bottom and the spring on top of that. correct me if i'm wrong please! i really irritated and tired right now but thanks for your help!!
2366996868_606a9c03da.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 06+ Civic Skunk2 Pro-C Coilovers | CorSport | CorSport | 37 | 10-30-2008 08:23 PM |
| Skunk2 Pro-S Coilovers : Pictures and Installation with Review | sctuned.com | Suspension and Brakes | 70 | 07-09-2008 12:01 AM |
| Skunk2 Pro-C Coilovers test review on FG2 | feichai | Suspension and Brakes | 97 | 04-21-2008 02:18 AM |
| Got pics of my new NHBP FA5 | CapnCrunch926 | Introduction & Pictures | 12 | 12-14-2007 10:32 PM |
| Sexy NHBP from Seattle -- Nude pics inside! | wookieloou | Introduction & Pictures | 20 | 06-14-2007 12:30 AM |