![]() |
|
|
|
#61 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
If I were building an STX Civic Si I would start with: Progress rear sway bar LX front bar A good coilover set up with front camber plates 17 x 8 wheels 235/40-17 tires (Advan Neovas, Bridgestone RE-01Rs, Falken Azenis RT-615s in order of preference and cost) Alignment Hawk HPS Brake Pads Intake Cat Back Exhaust This would be a good "local event" set-up. It would also be a fun car on the street. You ain't gonna have any street "kill" stories, and you won't win a Solo national championship, but you will have some fun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Camber plates can be used in ST* classes for the top mounting of struts. They usually allow for the max camber you can get with a strut suspension. Using camber bolts to install a coil over set up is also legal, even with camber plates. If you can get enough camber with the plates (I would suggest a minimum of 2.5 deg of negative camber in front) then I would not use camber bolts as they are known to slip. If you do use the bolts, make sure to over torque them and check them a lot. Not real familiar with Axxis pads. If you like them, that's fine. You just don't want something that needs a lot of heat to work good. Auto-x doesn't put that much heat in brakes. You just want something better than stock. I happen to like the Hawks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Also, wouldn't the LX front sway bar make for a less sharp turn-in, and make you have an earlier apex? Thanks for the info though, very helpful. +1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I know guys running 2.5+ deg. of camber on their cars for the street. As long as your toe is OK and you keep the tires rotated, you should be OK. Not as good as the stock alignment, regarding wear, but there has to be a trade off. Yes, a bigger front bar would give you better turn in, however the trade off is more push coming out of turns. The LX bar with a little toe out will do quite well at turn in and much better coming out of a tight corner than the Si bar. The biggest compliment I get on my car is how well it transitions. The biggest beef is it could rotate better. I'm running an HS class LX. I'd kill for a bigger rear bar (not stock legal) or maybe a smaller one in front (legal, but none available that I've found) to help the balance and get some rotation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Yes, I'm going wheels, tires, sway, Koni's when they come out, but if they don't come out--Teins, maybe. Maybe.
Then, pads, rotors. Also, I already have a P2R spacer I need to dyno-- over in Bolt-ons, people are seeing this gain as much as an intake alone, and the biggest gain is in modifying the exhaust system (H/Hi-flow Cat/E). I think the main problem is a support group (who are not way younger than me (36)) and only want to go fast. Lots of shops here are more for that, not many are auto-x-specific, and even that subset of Honda owners is probably even smaller (PDX area), yet smaller still for '06+ Si owners. We do have PIR though, so next year I hope to see some support (they're paving it now). Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
If the photo in this thread is correct: P2R Power Package: Intake Manifold Gasket, TB Gasket and TB Spacer the P2R spacer is illegal for STX. You can only modify the intake to the TB. It looks like the P2R goes between the TB and intake manifold. It does look like a trick piece though. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|