![]() |
|
|
|
#101 (permalink) |
|
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
![]() |
Our cars suspension is a completely different world than an 00 civic. Those civics you could get away with it being slammed and not having an alignment. You can't get away with that stuff in our cars. I'm sure you will be fine with one bolt. It will improve handing and won't cost anything in tire wear.
__________________
You know what the sun's all about when the light go out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#102 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
so I got my SPC Front camber bolts installed.
I wanted -1.5 in the front, -1.0 in the rear. Ended up getting -1.5 in the front, -2.0 in the rear, at first they said they couldnt do anything about the rear, then i said that i have adjustable arms in the rear, he said "really?", i said yea you guys installed them, then he said that that was the best they could do in the rear. opinions (on performance/tire life, and not being able to go -1.0 in the rear)? he also kept saying it'll eat my tires "really fast" |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#111 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Highrev1, thanks for the excellent advice on alignment settings. I just got my alignment done today and followed your advice for the camber settings, and I must say the car feels so much more nimble on the curves and the turn in is awesome.
+1 rep for you...Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 (permalink) |
|
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
![]() |
The purpose of this thread is promote getting a non factory alignment to help improve hanlding. It is assumed that people get an alignment after they put springs on. This thread just wants them to get adjustable camber parts in order to maximize the performance of their springs.
__________________
You know what the sun's all about when the light go out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Need your help Highrev.
Does having negative camber in the front have more effect than having camber in the rear? I just don't see a point of having much rear camber unless the car is accelerating out of a turn but our cars do not fully take advantage of our rear wheels to accelerate out a turn, so there isn't really a need to have that much camber as the stock setting since it doesn't fully benefit it (I'm just saying stuff here and I don't know if I'm right or wrong). I was planning to get ~1.0 neg camber up front and ~0 camber up back using the revised stock arm based on TSB 08-001. From my understanding, our rear suspension is designed to increase in negative camber during load or if the car is lowered (I'm planning to lower the car about an inch). Toe will be 0 all around. What do you think? I hope this make sense. I'm a complete newbie about this.. Last edited by lonelydriver; 03-11-2008 at 03:21 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
so therefore, reducing the camber in the rear to -.5 wouldn't necessarily be "bad", i just wouldn't recommend it per se. and with that then, i would recommend trying to run a bit more neg. camber in the front than -1.5, but if you wish to only run that much, that is fine as well. grip in the rear, for us, really comes into question when we're not accelerating, when weight isn't being transferred rearward to help plant the tires and beneficially causing the rear end to squat and induce added neg. camber. depending on what your daily commute is like, then running a degree of neg. camber in the rear shouldn't cause too much adverse tire wear. for example, i'm not on the highways all that long on a regular basis, and i can be said to be somewhat of a "spirited" corner carver, so my rear tires are getting rather even wear. (can't say the same for the front, since everything is still stock and the shoulder of my front tires hate me) it's all about compromise when dealing with our cars as daily drivers....learn as much as possible, then mod. have fun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
i need help, i have these skunk 2 camber arms. they have been installed for around a year. the passanger side rear arm was making a noise, it sounded like the bushing, they were set to 5 showing threads. i took off the camber arm and set it to the stock setting. the camber was visually off, so i took off the kit and adjusted it to 2 showing threads. there is still camber so i think i need to adjust the arm further, but how far is too far?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tein S-techs w/ SPC camber kit | Si_yoc | Suspension and Brakes | 3 | 04-12-2007 08:02 AM |
| s tech tein spring, need a rear camber kit? | ronjancivicsi | Suspension and Brakes | 4 | 04-06-2007 10:25 PM |
| Cheap camber kit? | 06RALLYREDSI | Suspension and Brakes | 50 | 03-14-2007 07:25 AM |
| i got away without camber kit. | darna | Suspension and Brakes | 13 | 12-10-2006 01:08 PM |
| Comptech vs SPC camber kit....need pics | 06Fg2 | Suspension and Brakes | 8 | 12-07-2006 10:18 PM |