![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Has this happened to you? (Only vote if you fall into the following categories) | |||
| Yes, with a Progress rear sway bar |
|
9 | 5.36% |
| Yes, with another aftermarket rear sway bar |
|
1 | 0.60% |
| No, but my stock end links broke |
|
9 | 5.36% |
It won't ever happen to me because this thread really scared me!
|
|
149 | 88.69% |
| Voters: 168. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (7) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#81 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 (permalink) | |
|
HR1!!!!!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DIRTYJERZ
Age: 28
Posts: 3,496
Greg@Redshiftmotorsports.com
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Titanium of course :)
or carbon fiber.
__________________
Quote:
![]() Willwood BBK For Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Endlinks are the same on all trims however ( http://www.hondanews.com/categories/957/releases/2778 ) claims that the Si has: (over the non si Civic)
Heavy duty front wheel hub and bearings Heavy duty front and rear lower control arms |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 (permalink) | |
|
Slave to the corporation
|
^ Earlier in this thread, I forget where, I posted my findings from hondapartsdeals.com. The Si and non-Si part numbers for the LCA are different, but I realized today that that is likely due to the different hub/knuckle design. From blueroadster's pics, the endlink bracket looks exactly the same.
Coles Notes: If I had an Si, I'd be playing it safe and welding or getting Highrev's brackets.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 (permalink) | |
|
Slave to the corporation
|
If anyone has any ideas on this, please let me know too:
Progress rear swaybar rattling ^ It's really starting to piss me off ![]()
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Can we add a choice to the poll for the people who have the Progress bar installed, and haven't had any problems? I feel that this will give us objective results? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 (permalink) | |
|
HR1!!!!!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DIRTYJERZ
Age: 28
Posts: 3,496
Greg@Redshiftmotorsports.com
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Well...this would def. explain the tear out you got. It appears they move the bar down with the adapter plates, sitting it in stock position would DEF. add stress to the endlink mounting location, and the weakest part brok first.
Guess this just means don't install the bar without the adapter kit.
__________________
Quote:
![]() Willwood BBK For Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 (permalink) | ||
|
HR1!!!!!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DIRTYJERZ
Age: 28
Posts: 3,496
Greg@Redshiftmotorsports.com
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
SI=no bracekts non si = brackets needed.
__________________
Quote:
![]() Willwood BBK For Sale |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#98 (permalink) | ||
|
Slave to the corporation
|
Quote:
I considered the fact that the original mounting location might have had something to do with the break. But I have trouble wrapping my mind around that, considering that the difference in the location between then and now is only about 1/2". And as iomatic said, it is a front tear out. The fact that the bar was originally incorrectly installed certainly didn't help the situation, but I think the fact that the bar is simply much stiffer than the original bar is the bigger player here.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|