![]() |
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
^^No prob my pleasure.
Quote:
I am sure that was just a difference in either your mind, or the way you were driving the car. Even though I have no clue on the HFP damper valving, I find it hard that Honda would allow for their rear dampers to be valved so much that the car would understeer. They just can't do that do to liability reasons, especially in inclement weather people would be wrecking left and right (not meant to be a jerk) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Greg: Upgrading sway bars isn't necessarily a bad thing. A lot WRX drivers like to get stiffer rear sways (20mm from 17mm) since it comes with a lot of understeer off the lot, and also has smaller sways than in other regions. As for my planned setup, when I get my Skunk2 camber front/rear I'm planning on -1.2 up front and -0.8 to the rears to go along w/ my Eibach Pros--a bit less than your recommended setup just to minimize inside tire wear. This is my daily driver, afterall. Last edited by aki; 06-05-2007 at 03:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I never said it was. I would much rather prefer to tune with spring and dampers rather then sway bars though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Springs bounce thats what they do the dampers control this bounce. You could run factory springs with a good shock such as the fsd and have a car that handles really well.
The konis would control the bounce perfectly, and the added valving would quell some body roll. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The Si does "oversteer" when taking a corner too fast; maybe that's what bluetroll meant instead.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
- Cheater. You got a larger sidewall on your tires to better fill in the fender gap. You got 225/45/17 tires. That why it looks better. Your overall diameter is 24.97". While the stock tire on the EX (205/55/16) is a 24.87" overall diameter. And the Si Civic's have a 215/45/17 tire with an overall diameter of 24.61". - I went with a 225/40/18 tire with a 25.08" overall diameter this fills in the fender gap by a tenth of an inch, consequently it also raises the car a tenth of an inch. If every one were to keep there stock tires the non Si Civics would look lower with the HFP suspension kit.
Last edited by Andrei'sCivic; 06-06-2007 at 04:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Progress: rear anti sway bar= 22mm solid Compared to my stock 11mm rear anti sway bar the stock Si one is not flexible. (by hand) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
yes, it used to understeer with 17mm RSB... now with the 22mm RSB, i can feel the rear end of the car come around quicker... it feels quite different, but i like it... you can really take the car to the limits. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/suspension-brakes/38479-pics-hfp-suspension-before-after.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| pics of hfp suspension (before & after) - Page 5 - 8th Generation Honda Civic Forum | This thread | Refback | 01-07-2008 09:16 PM | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which suspension best for Sedan: Si Coupe Suspension or HFP? | mikeymike | Suspension and Brakes | 17 | 02-24-2009 01:36 PM |
| HFP Suspension Does NOT Lower Car ? | Bombero | Suspension and Brakes | 23 | 05-08-2007 03:48 AM |
| HFP Suspension Kit Pictures? | FIJIROB | Suspension and Brakes | 4 | 04-21-2007 03:36 AM |
| HFP Suspension Kit...auto vs manual??? | DooD | Suspension and Brakes | 4 | 12-13-2006 08:32 PM |
| EP3's HFP wheels on Si...with Pics !!! | psc001 | Wheel And Tire Upgrades | 28 | 09-12-2006 02:20 PM |