![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 869
KiDD
|
no, pro-s is like a semi adjustable coilovers, it will rear will only drop so low, for Pro-c, it's fully adjustable, therefore the pro-s cost less than pro-c. i would go for pro-c if i were you
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 26
Posts: 1,971
|
The ability to drop the car is comparable between the two. I believe both use the same rear perch.
They also have the same springs rates, which are considerably stiffer than stock. The major difference is the twin-tube construction on the S (poor damping and non-adjustable) vs. the monotube construction (better controlled, adjustable, and more resistance to fade). Also, only the Cs have shock travel adjustment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Copperas Cove, Texas
Age: 20
Posts: 11,618
david
|
pro-s: height adjustable only
pro-c: height, preload, dampening, camber adjusment i personally have buddy club n+, and i love em...i cant say anything about pro-c but pro-s is too bouncy and stiff do to the lack of preload adjusment and shock travel |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Skunk 2 pro s Lifespan? | silentkillz1 | Suspension and Brakes | 9 | 10-12-2008 03:44 PM |
| skunk 2 pro s | mosi123 | Suspension and Brakes | 2 | 03-10-2008 01:54 AM |