![]() |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
LinkBack (5) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#102 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 830
Michael
|
Im very much the same with you and have been working on finding the perfect suspension for a long time and what youve described is right.
You cant go too low , going too low just kills the suspension stroke. Causes bottoming which completely upsets the vehicle and causes major loss of traction. Also keep in mind a softer suspension can sometimes yeild better corner grabbing or traction due to it absorbing the imperfections in the road better. Lower will help center of gravity but Honda tried to get it as low as possible without sacrifice of comfort. You can only take it further by a margin. If you had a perfectly 100% perfect flat glass like surface though you could really lower a car...but there isnt such a thing , even on a world class race course. So in that thought and for the fact of 90% of us buying these cars to run on the street...going stiff really isnt a good idea. Especially when you stiffen the rear as rear traction is very critical to the car because your only going to understeer if you go into a corner to hot (your fault). But too stiff a rear you can loose it in many situations and emergency situations and have a completely uncontrolable car. Reasons why I stay away from all Type-R / Mugen suspensions. Because Honda historically increases the rear stiffness in these vehicles for quicker on track turn in. On the street this can be scary in emergency abrupt like manuevers. Either way to cut it short , heres somethings to think about. 1. Sway bar increases your spring rate as you corner , so you can run a soft spring and a sway bar and have less roll in the corners...but again is the stiff suspension in the corner going to help you. You will still get soft ride going straight though. 2. I too went with a linear moderately lowered spring and a koni yellow and adjusted the damper accordingly. This did net me the best ride possible in my old Honda. Keep in mind Honda built the suspension and geometry too. No need to try to out think millions in R&D. They do try to get the best of all worlds so tweaking it a little can net better results at the sacrifice of ride quality. Otherwise HFP is killer , even in autocross. 3. More negative camber in the rear will = more response overall. Negative camber will increase corner grip all around to a point. But will sacrifice straight line acceleration grip. 4. The best way to increase your handling performance with no negatives is with chassis braces. This creates a environment that allows the suspension to work the way it should without any outside forces acting on it. As the saying goes , you can tune your suspension and tires. Not your chassis. 5. Unsprung weight and weight in general is just bad for all things performance , comfort , efficiency. Only when you make things lighter to where the durability is lost is when this becomes of concern. Great write up though. Just wanted to add a little extra. Was bored. Last edited by mike_sho; 11-16-2009 at 01:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#103 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Age: 24
Posts: 4,356
Evan
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
even mugen has sport suspensions which are similar to HFP suspension. Last edited by kbye; 11-20-2009 at 01:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 830
Michael
|
Quote:
Type-r vehicles arent meant just for daily drivers , nor mugens. The rears are stiffer and this causes a great track car but a more difficult DD. (take that comment sparingly). The cars can still be easily dd , but come certain situations it can be a life threating choice. Just think , if all Honda has to come up with is a stiffer spring at no cost to them , why wasnt this overly stiff rear suspension stuck on the SI's.....was it just comfort? Ill answer with the SI is the best balance of street and track , with more focus on the street. The type-r is the race breed version of that and when the world is watching they want its times to show grand. Its quite obvious if you have even been in an integra type-r or type-r swapped suspension. It can get a little hairy on the street , rain or cold weather in tense situations. Otherwise your none the wiser of a somewhat firmer ride. A soft rear end is where its at...its not as direct or quick , keeping the rear planted (grip) is paramount in a street car. No matter the drive wheel orientation. In aspects of racing or street...Ive driven many different platforms. I have read the bible of suspension tuning books over and over and reference it quite often as well have tested it. Stiffer rear = more rotation. Last edited by mike_sho; 11-21-2009 at 03:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Age: 27
Posts: 23,186
Joey
|
Quote:
The only 'actual' part number I know is the KONI direct part numbers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Burbs Chicago
Posts: 2,205
|
Hope this is an OK place to post this question?
What do you think of these prices. Tax is NOT included. I thought they are pretty high myself. Please let me know what you think. koni shocks $300 front, $320 rear eibach pro kit: $200 install: $250 Tax not included. |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: My yea me
Posts: 2,090
8thFLcrew212/I<3DrivingSlow212
|
Does anybody have HFP with Nuespeed race springs? Or would it be better to get Koni yellow with the Nuespeed race springs? I have heard a lot about HFP with Eibach sportlines. Which I think might be the better set up. But I would like that 2inch drop and I'm pretty sure Nuespeed is better than Skunk2 when it comes to springs. Thanks in advance. If anybody can help me out with some insight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 271
|
I don't think rust proofing is necessary. If the stock housings can survive canadian winters then so can redshift. i've never heard a case where the stock suspension rusts and mine has yet to either. keep in mind i live in calgary where we sprinkle salt on roads like McD fries.
powdercoating yellow might not be a bad idea though
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,157
|
Quote:
Also, I usually drive my 01 accord coupe cuz it has winters. My SI is in the garage like 90% of the time. Got it Feb and it has almost 4000km. hehe so little usage. The rust proof I did to the SI is some new system and it looks like it hasent been rust proofed I complained to the dealer but he said it has been and I can bring it in to re-do it any time I want for the life of the car. *usually rust proofing has like yellow gunk or black but this **** is clear and looks like its not there* end rant//// |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 (permalink) |
|
Jo-Von-E
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: C-town, Or
Age: 23
Posts: 13,350
Jhovany M.
|
Okay, just got done reading the post and I am still kinda confused with some questions.
I wanted to get the HFP suspension kit, but wanted a bit more of a drop. So I was looking at the KONI and spring combo, but this set up is gonna end up costing more correct? Also, the KONI shocks and springs could be considered a custom set up opposed to that of coil overs? |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Age: 27
Posts: 23,186
Joey
|
Quote:
KONI provides shock dynos and most coilover companies do not, makes me wonder, and should make anyone else wonder too. KONIs can be customized in the aspects of sending to KONI-na for custom valving services if desired. They are also rebuildable, you don't buy new KONI units when they exceeded their useful life, you send them in to be rebuilt. Not sure on cost as I have not done that yet. Redshift/ KONI coilover suspension is fully customizable. You can in the end choose your valving, spring rates, spring length and height. Knowing what you want out of the suspension in the end is most important. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/suspension-brakes/162174-comparison-stock-suspension-vs-hfp-suspension-vs-koni-swift-springs-suspension.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Fa5 - 75k miles - Which shocks - Honda-Tech | This thread | Refback | 09-12-2011 09:39 AM | |
| Fa5 - 75k miles - Which shocks - Honda-Tech | This thread | Refback | 09-04-2011 04:16 PM | |
| Fa5 - 75k miles - Which shocks - Honda-Tech | This thread | Refback | 09-02-2011 03:13 PM | |
| ?????? ?????? ???????? ? ??????????? ??????? ????? - Club Civic Russia - ???????? 2 | This thread | Refback | 07-24-2011 01:30 PM | |
| ?????? ?????? ???????? ? ??????????? ??????? ????? - Club Civic Russia - ???????? 2 | This thread | Refback | 07-11-2011 04:48 AM | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HFP Suspension or Redshift/Koni Special D (Reds) w/ Sportlines? | 07k20si | Suspension and Brakes | 50 | 09-11-2009 11:00 AM |
| Comparison between HFP (states) and HFP (JDM) Suspension | No. 7 | Suspension and Brakes | 2 | 04-06-2008 02:09 PM |
| HFP springs on stock si suspension set up | hhtran1 | Suspension and Brakes | 2 | 03-31-2008 03:11 AM |