Post your HDRIs! (56k try again) - Page 2

***Barry*** · 05-27-2008, 04:43 PM

This looks alittle better to me but let me know what you think.

Dubtek3060 · 05-27-2008, 04:45 PM

its blurry lol.

seems like people use HDR as a crutch for bad photography, which is what i used to do at the starting then realized that its better to learn how to take a properly exposed picture, which i still suck at lol

sk33ny · 05-27-2008, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry

This looks alittle better to me but let me know what you think.

Looks way to over exposed and the blur in the picture (which is my fault and i tryed to hide by editing) pops out alot more. Heres a new HDR i took a hour or so ago. Again, im still experimenting with the technique and the tone mapping.

***Barry*** · 05-27-2008, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubtek3060

its blurry lol.

Haha well i can't fix that.

illusionstwice · 05-27-2008, 04:45 PM

***Barry*** · 05-27-2008, 04:46 PM

sk33ny see to me yours looks wayyy too dark

Dubtek3060 · 05-27-2008, 04:46 PM

barry that shot is good, i enjoy it maybe a little too much foreground but i guess you cant help that either.

illusionstwice · 05-27-2008, 04:46 PM

***Barry*** · 05-27-2008, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubtek3060

barry that shot is good, i enjoy it maybe a little too much foreground but i guess you cant help that either.

Which shot the one i editted or my actual picture?

sk33ny · 05-27-2008, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry

sk33ny see to me yours looks wayyy too dark

Yea i like the dark look, but your monitor also might need to be brightened up a bit. Try defaulting the settings and see what happenes.

Dubtek3060 · 05-27-2008, 04:47 PM

your actual picture

***Barry*** · 05-27-2008, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by illusionstwice

See this is a perfect example of something that really isn't even hdr and isn't using any of the hdr benefits to help a poorly exposed picture.

***Barry*** · 05-27-2008, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubtek3060

your actual picture

Too much foreground meaning the steps or the bricks in front of the steps.

Dubtek3060 · 05-27-2008, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry

Too much foreground meaning the steps or the bricks in front of the steps.

lol im stupid as ****, i thought the mountain shot was yours...

my only critique of the stairs is the light pole looks crooked and its way too surreal for me.

the mountain shot has too much foreground lol

***Barry*** · 05-27-2008, 04:53 PM

Dubtek3060 · 05-27-2008, 04:55 PM

eh the building is cut off, otherwise thats a great photo.

illusionstwice · 05-27-2008, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry

See this is a perfect example of something that really isn't even hdr and isn't using any of the hdr benefits to help a poorly exposed picture.

I just posted it. Its one of the best shots I have. The photographer I used doesnt like how it came out either. We were both on the NJ tpike and were doing bout 75mph.

I dont really know much about HDR..or photography in the first place.

***Barry*** · 05-27-2008, 05:05 PM

This is why it is cut off.

Geaux · 05-27-2008, 06:53 PM

My first attempts. Keep in mind this is a point/shoot Exilim 7.2 mp I can't afford the big boy camera at the moment haha.

Criticisms welcome, positive and negative. I'm always up for learning something new to better my photography.

ac2539 · 05-27-2008, 06:54 PM

Nice shot Barry.

I'm still experimenting like most others. I'm not sure how well I'm doing...

Wish I had Photomatix or CS2, watermarks!

05-27-2008, 04:46 PM	#26 (permalink)
*Barry* Cameras Are Cool MMMkay Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Penn Valley, PA Age: 23 Posts: 904 Name: Barry iTrader: 0 / 0%	sk33ny see to me yours looks wayyy too dark __________________ Camera Ish: Nikon D700 w/MB-D10 Battery Grip w/en-el4a, Nikon D90, Nikon 14-24 f2.8 Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm f1.4, Nikon 60mm f2.8 Macro, Tokina 12-24 f4, Nikon 80-200 f2.8, Kenko 1.4x Teleconverter, 2x SB-800's, 3x Pocket-Wizard Plus II's, Bogen 3021 4 Section w/ Bogen 488rc4 Ball Head, Nikon n75, Nikon N8008s, Nikon 28-85 My Photo Links: My Fotki My Flickr

05-27-2008, 04:53 PM	#35 (permalink)
*Barry* Cameras Are Cool MMMkay Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Penn Valley, PA Age: 23 Posts: 904 Name: Barry iTrader: 0 / 0%	__________________ Camera Ish: Nikon D700 w/MB-D10 Battery Grip w/en-el4a, Nikon D90, Nikon 14-24 f2.8 Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm f1.4, Nikon 60mm f2.8 Macro, Tokina 12-24 f4, Nikon 80-200 f2.8, Kenko 1.4x Teleconverter, 2x SB-800's, 3x Pocket-Wizard Plus II's, Bogen 3021 4 Section w/ Bogen 488rc4 Ball Head, Nikon n75, Nikon N8008s, Nikon 28-85 My Photo Links: My Fotki My Flickr

05-27-2008, 05:05 PM	#38 (permalink)
*Barry* Cameras Are Cool MMMkay Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Penn Valley, PA Age: 23 Posts: 904 Name: Barry iTrader: 0 / 0%	This is why it is cut off. __________________ Camera Ish: Nikon D700 w/MB-D10 Battery Grip w/en-el4a, Nikon D90, Nikon 14-24 f2.8 Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm f1.4, Nikon 60mm f2.8 Macro, Tokina 12-24 f4, Nikon 80-200 f2.8, Kenko 1.4x Teleconverter, 2x SB-800's, 3x Pocket-Wizard Plus II's, Bogen 3021 4 Section w/ Bogen 488rc4 Ball Head, Nikon n75, Nikon N8008s, Nikon 28-85 My Photo Links: My Fotki My Flickr

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
I told myself I wouldn't... 56k...what's 56k?	shukes24	Introduction & Pictures	29	07-16-2007 10:34 AM
My new Si (56k take a nap)	stlth_bmb3r	Introduction & Pictures	6	04-08-2007 01:23 PM
NOT SI pix...56k is a no no	CivicWithNav	Introduction & Pictures	31	12-12-2006 02:03 PM
No 56K?	martinez_josh	Water Cooler	14	10-16-2006 01:44 PM

05-27-2008, 04:45 PM	#22 (permalink)
Dubtek3060 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 303 iTrader: 0 / 0%	its blurry lol. seems like people use HDR as a crutch for bad photography, which is what i used to do at the starting then realized that its better to learn how to take a properly exposed picture, which i still suck at lol

05-27-2008, 04:45 PM	#25 (permalink)
illusionstwice Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: DiRtY JerZ Age: 25 Posts: 19,563 The original --> "J" <-- iTrader: 8 / 100%

05-27-2008, 04:46 PM	#27 (permalink)
Dubtek3060 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 303 iTrader: 0 / 0%	barry that shot is good, i enjoy it maybe a little too much foreground but i guess you cant help that either.

05-27-2008, 04:46 PM	#28 (permalink)
illusionstwice Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: DiRtY JerZ Age: 25 Posts: 19,563 The original --> "J" <-- iTrader: 8 / 100%

05-27-2008, 04:47 PM	#31 (permalink)
Dubtek3060 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 303 iTrader: 0 / 0%	your actual picture

05-27-2008, 04:55 PM	#36 (permalink)
Dubtek3060 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 303 iTrader: 0 / 0%	eh the building is cut off, otherwise thats a great photo.

05-27-2008, 06:53 PM	#39 (permalink)
Geaux Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 215 iTrader: 0 / 0%	My first attempts. Keep in mind this is a point/shoot Exilim 7.2 mp I can't afford the big boy camera at the moment haha. Criticisms welcome, positive and negative. I'm always up for learning something new to better my photography.

05-27-2008, 06:54 PM	#40 (permalink)
ac2539 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Fremont, CA Age: 21 Posts: 1,669 iTrader: 3 / 100%	Nice shot Barry. I'm still experimenting like most others. I'm not sure how well I'm doing... Wish I had Photomatix or CS2, watermarks!