Project 8 - March 2008 Photography Challenge: "Geometry"

[Mikey6p]

Originally Posted by szuberi

my entry: somewhere around manhattan

I really like that shot.

[skiz]

Great shots everyone! This month has been very interesting... Geometry EVERYWHERE!

[arisenfury]

The windows on the building in the forefront are huuuugggee.

[2f2fc1v1c]

Originally Posted by kelmar

Here's my cellphone shot from the other day at work. My camera seems to have gotten legs and walked away

wana swap your cellphone with my nikon D40??????

[truflip]

Originally Posted by kelmar

Here's my cellphone shot from the other day at work. My camera seems to have gotten legs and walked away

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a36...st/March08.jpg

Bad picture quality. There's chroma noise everywhere, the white edges have ghosting effect, its not sharp.. not much detail. This is fake.
And oh, did I mention the lens flare?

Just kidding, awesome shot!

[JeShUa]

Not EXACTLY how I planned it.. but fairly close :[.. Izzy told me I fail :[.

[Izzy]

I didn't say you fail. I merely asked why it wasn't straighter.

It's a lot better than my entry.

[truflip]

But deep down, you think he failed right?

[JeShUa]

HAHA.

[GETxERxDONE]

Originally Posted by Izzy

I merely asked why it wasn't straighter.

its because of his lazy eye, haha

great pics this one..gonna be difficult to vote lol

[wing_gundam]

make sure you have specified which is your shot for submission and exif data is there

[arisenfury]

Originally Posted by JeShUa

Not EXACTLY how I planned it.. but fairly close :[.. Izzy told me I fail :[.

Finally someone knows how to make a proper 8-Ball rack! Too bad it's too far up though .

Also was wondering when someone would use Pool for their interpretation, the whole game is geometry haha, with a little bit of physics on the side.

[wing_gundam]

Originally Posted by arisenfury

Finally someone knows how to make a proper 8-Ball rack! Too bad it's too far up though .

Also was wondering when someone would use Pool for their interpretation, the whole game is geometry haha, with a little bit of physics on the side.

I used pool already....

then changed my mind

hence the avatar

[GETxERxDONE]

Project 8 - March 2008 Photography Challenge: "Geometry"
thats my entry post, can someone check for exif? i dont have the checker on this comp

[2f2fc1v1c]

Originally Posted by GETxERxDONE

Project 8 - March 2008 Photography Challenge: "Geometry"
thats my entry post, can someone check for exif? i dont have the checker on this comp

^here you go

Orientation of image: 1
File change date and time: 2008:03:24 17:21:24
Image input equipment manufacturer: NIKON CORPORATION
Image input equipment model: NIKON D40X
Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS Windows
Exposure time: 0.003125
F number: 9
Exposure program: 0
ISO speed rating: 100
Exposure bias: 0
Maximum lens aperture: 3.6
Metering mode: 5
Light source: 0
Flash: 16
Lens focal length: 18
Sensing method: 2
Custom rendered: 0
Exposure mode: 0
White balance: 0
Digital zoom ratio: 1
Focal length in 35 mm film: 27
Scene capture type: 0
Gain control: 0
Contrast: 0
Saturation: 0
Sharpness: 0
Subject distance range: 0

[GETxERxDONE]

thanks

[Izzy]

Originally Posted by truflip

But deep down, you think he failed right?

My vocalities about his failure as his chances to win rise in conjunction with each other.

But, nah, overall, I still like the picture.

My official entry:

Camera Make: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS 30D
Image Date: 2008:03:24 00:31:06
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 80.0mm
CCD Width: 22.48mm
Exposure Time: 0.020 s (1/50)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO equiv: 100
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual

[2f2fc1v1c]

My Entry




Orientation of image: 1
File change date and time: 2008:03:31 14:30:29
Image input equipment manufacturer: NIKON CORPORATION
Image input equipment model: NIKON D40
Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS2 Macintosh
Exposure time: 0.0166667
F number: 5.6
Exposure program: 0
ISO speed rating: 400
Exposure bias: 0
Maximum lens aperture: 4
Metering mode: 5
Light source: 0
Flash: 0
Lens focal length: 26
Sensing method: 2
Custom rendered: 0
Exposure mode: 0
White balance: 0
Digital zoom ratio: 1
Focal length in 35 mm film: 39
Scene capture type: 0
Gain control: 1
Contrast: 0
Saturation: 0
Sharpness: 0
Subject distance range: 0

[JeShUa]

Originally Posted by Izzy

It's definitely worth the 500$ difference between my 17-50mm. I haven't used the 28-70 Tamron, but the f2.8L is just better at focusing (faster too) and colors are better than my own Tamron. I'm seriously debating selling off my own Tamron, and getting the 24-70mm and getting something to fill in that wide that I need.

Actually they're very similar.. depends on your financial situation.

[Izzy]

Originally Posted by JeShUa

Actually they're very similar.. depends on your financial situation.

I'm not too particularly fond of the AF system in the Tamron...though it is amusing at times.

If the 28-70mm is built the same as my Tamron, then the Canon definitely has a more...durable feel to the build.