![]() |
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
He actually knows what he's talking about. BTW why was "the left light screwed into the the socket incorrectly"? :gaygiggle You've been working with cars for almost a decade supposedly. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
And btw, I never claimed I know more than anyone. I just claimed that I have experience in the field, as well as others on this board... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
TATE & AKI
You FOOLS are arguing with nothing to back up what you are saying. You keep dodging the real facts in this discussion. You idiots are reading other people's research on the internet, and taking it as the HID Bible. I think me and 2RotorMotor's experience COMPLETELY outweigh your ability quote random web research. (i'm surprised you guys can read considering how stupid you guys are). I'm tired of being nice. YOU GUYS ARE JUST PLAIN DUMB & DUMBER. Aki, I've already had this discussion with you and proved you wrong in a previous thread. STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION ON THIS SITE BASED OFF OF YOUR WEB SURFING. You keep trying to twist numbers. Yes, halogens are 1000-1600 lm. We are talking about low beams only though IDIOT. 99% of low beam halogens don't go over 1100lm. Only high beams reach 1600lm. And as I said on a previous post to you Aki, we are talking about the 8th Gen Civic low beam (1000lm) because.... well... this is a 8th gen civic forum. And if you read my posts, there are 2 kinds of HID bulbs out there... not all bulbs are equal. There are cheap HID bulbs, which have blue or purple color due to them being tinted, similiar to a blue halogen bulb. High quality HID bulbs are not tinted, and have the blood stained capsule inside the bulb. The lumen output I posted refer to these higher quality bulbs, and I'm sure your research is referring to the tinted HID bulbs. Also, not all stock HID equiped cars have projector beams, that's why they make 2 different kind of bulbs; D2S and D2R. One is meant for use in projector beams, and one is made for use in regular housings. And you analogy about the garden hose, was purely MORONIC. Don't try to act smart by making analogies about a subject you clearly know nothing about. Here's an analogy for you: TAKING WHAT AKI SAYS AS FACT IS LIKE BELIEVING SUPERMAN REALLY EXISTS. I don't want to argue with DUMB & DUMBER anymore. It's obvious from the pics all these other people posted that you guys are wrong. I'm glad this world is full of idiots like Tate and Aki because if we were all smart, I wouldn't be as successful as I am. Last edited by XeNonCiViC; 05-26-2006 at 01:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Member
|
here is a link for those who think a kit in a stock halogen is better than a projector.
The right headlight has a 8000k HID kit and the left has a S2000 4300k you be the judge!! http://www.littodevilperformance.com...comparison.wmv |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
obviously a projector is better.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
that picture is invalid. your car is pointing towards and is closer to the camera whereas everyone else is farther and pointing away. Of course it's going to seem better. Take a picture from the top down and you'll see how much less it lights up than the stock 4300k. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
When i pull next to a car that has blue colored HID's, my stock halogens are definitely brighter than theirs. The only reason people think those hid's are brighter, is because they're usually not aimed correctly, or in stock housings so their blinding the shit out of other people anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) | |
|
Go BUCKS!
![]() |
Quote:
Of course its brighter, you are actually pointed at the camera! Besides, you have an INSANE amount of glare from those hadlights! Its looks brighter to you because the light being emitted from the headlights isn't FOCUSED like it is supposed to be (as in within a HID-designed headlight housing). When designing the optics (lens and/or reflector) for a lamp, the characteristics of the light source are THE driving factor around which everything else must be engineered. If you go and change the light source, you've done the equivalent of putting on somebody else's eyeglasses: You can probably make them fit on your face OK, but you won't see properly. The headlight reflectors and lenses of OEM HID headlights are engineered specifically for use with HID arc capsules. The design not only considers the source focal points, but the amount of lumens to be distributed. These factors are often overlooked when retrofitting is considered. OEM HID optics distribute the increased lumen output of this bulb farther ahead on the road, wider to both sides, without giving more directly in front of the subjected vehicle. This provides motorists with much WIDER AND DEEPER night time vision. By contrast, halogen headlight optics do not spread the light to the degree of OEM HID. This is simply because a 55 watt halogen bulb (or even a 100 watter) cannot match the lumen output of HID. A lower number of lumens means less light to spread out. And a bigger portion of the total light output have to be placed where its mostly needed: straight ahead. Now, consider what what happens when someone inserts a 2800-3200 lumen HID arc capsule into a headlight designed to distribute only 1/3 of this amount of light. Suddenly, there's too much light in areas that does not need more light: - Too much light above cutoff line which would be above horizon on a flat road. This will glare oncoming traffic. - Too much light below cutoff line which would glare dangerously towoards oncoming traffic on a hill. - Too much foreground lighting. The driver will get the intense foreground lighting back in his own eyes, making eyes less sensitive for down the road illumination beyond 70 meters down the road. This is the most dangerous part of the attempt to "retrofit" Xenon headlamps. Sometimes you get a deceptive and illusory "improvement" in the performance of the headlamp. The performance of the headlamp is perceived to be "better" because of the much higher level of foreground lighting (on the road immediately in front of the car). However, the beam patterns produced by this kind of "conversion" virtually always give less distance light, and often an alarming lack of light where there's meant to be a relative maximum in light intensity. The result is the illusion that you can see better than you actually can, and that's not safe. And yes, I said it, HID's DO produce more lumens, but thats a given really. I mean, the ballasts powering these bulbs convert the 12V input to THOUSANDS of volts to output to the HID bulb. This is to be expected. And while it is true that the higher Kelvin light is more unusable, it still produces more lumens up to a certain point. BUT, it is harder on the eyes. In ophthalmology, high energy visible light (HEV light) is high frequency light from 380 nm (UV light) to 530 nm (greenish-blueish light) in the visible spectrum. HEV light has been blamed as a cause of age-related macular degeneration. But this isn't because of the "UV" light emitted from HID bulbs. The arc within an HID headlamp bulb generates considerable short-wave ultraviolet (UV) light, but none of it escapes the bulb. A UV-absorbing hard glass shield is incorporated around the bulb's arc tube. This is important to prevent degradation of UV-sensitive components and materials in headlamps, such as polycarbonate lenses and reflector hardcoats. The lamps do emit considerable near-UV light. What gets me about all this argueing is that yeah, while your HIDs ARE outputting more lumens, its all going to the wrong places unless you either go projector, or retrofit an ENTIRE headlight housing. I know the main arguement is the lumen output, but in reality, thats pointless considering you aren't putting the light where it NEEDS to be. If you actually read throught all this, then good for you, I didn't mean for it to be this long! Sorry!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
10000k is definitely weaker than 6000k. Here's my take on this.
The higher the kelvin rating, the bluer it is. If you look at the light spectrum, blue is darker than yellow or white. So giving a blue light, you are having less contrast than the dark environment that you are in as compared to 6000k. I have 8000k - it is legal here in the Philippines (heck everything is hehe) - and it is darker than my friend's 6000K Here's a pic of my HID - i'm sure your's would be darker ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I said, fack it. And ordered me some HIDs. Read all that bullcrap on those sites about poor light quality and all this other non-sense. Believed it for a second but with my enyving for other people with HIDs I had to. I just wanna say it, my Philips bulb are plain [white and boring (<--lolz)]. So I decided to order some HIDs, and I also went with the 10,000k. I'll be right behind ya FatHo. HIDs FTMFW!
|
|
|
|