![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#362 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,259
Matt
|
The hold in the TB spacer is horrible. You are not supposed to spray after the MAF because there is unmetered air and that's no good.
I believe it really has to be before the MAF. |
|
|
|
|
|
#369 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
I am willing to bet the gains for this intake will be comparable to any other quality cold air intake. And... I never went off topic. I am still talking about the password jdm intake. I am just saying its not wise to jump the gun saying this intake is going to be a godsend when there has been no testing so far. Last edited by kurdtkobain87; 08-04-2009 at 04:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#370 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 26
Posts: 4,297
Victor (S. FL Member #28)
|
Quote:
See what you said... "I am willing to bet the gains for this intake will be comparable to any other quality cold air intake." Exactly! Performance without compromise... no hydrolock, great design, high quality... what else can you ask for? Even if it performances on par with all CAI that is still amzing considering it's not running a long tube to the ground where the cold air is lol. But again, I do see your point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#371 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 19,591
Never Again!
|
Quote:
I don't see anyone "jumping the bandwagon". This is an overstatement. Based on the design of the intake, it certainly has potential. Out of curiosity, what is your idea of a "godsend" regarding intakes? What intake out there not only performs well, but has no drawbacks? Enquiring minds want to know.
__________________
![]() Some cause happiness wherever they go: others whenever they go. -Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#373 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
I do not believe there is a "godsend" when it comes to intakes for our car. Honda has given us a pretty well tuned car from the factory, and the factory intake is designed nicely. This is why no intake has given significant gains without some kind of tuning mechanism (flashpro, cobb ap, etc). When it comes to intakes for cars there is a "point of diminishing returns" there is only so much power a specific car can make from a bolt-on intake. So ultimately I am predicting this intake will be a benefit for those who are looking for a balance between a cold-air and a short ram intake. With this intake people will not have to fear hydrolocking as much as they would with a cai. I am willing to bet that the power improvement will be equal to or less than that of a cold air intake. And also... I never said the x-intake was a bad intake I simply said it is not what everyone blew it up to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#374 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Age: 28
Posts: 482
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#375 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 141
|
And thats awesome! It looks like a really great intake. I just think in terms of power it will be comparable to any other intakes. In terms of practicality I believe it will benefit many because of no fear of hydrolocking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#376 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL - Orange Park
Posts: 5,928
Artem
|
Quote:
I agree with you that you can only make but so much power from "just an intake" however, even if this intake doesn't make dramatically more power then anything else currently available, even if it makes the same power as say a CAI (on a dyno) no other intake will match this one as far as throttle response is concerned. Period. There is no denying it. The huge volume of air that is ready for you when you open the throttle dominates both CAI and SRI. On top of that, every intake will make more power if you tune it. every power mod will make more power once tuned. I bet if you have stage 2 cams, race header, etc and then do back to back dyno's with this intake vs a regular SRI, this intake will make more power. Throttle response will be much, much better as well and thats basically what this intake is all about. True performance, not just dyno numbers. If you look at what T1R says about their intake, their main focus was to increase throttle response, not necessarily power production because the stock box is pretty good at supplying the engine with the required air, but lacks throttle response. Last edited by bro2snakeaterblk08; 08-04-2009 at 06:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#378 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 353
|
I wont waste my time arguing about gains or driveability. I'm just waiting for the release and to see a couple dyno charts and hear some reviews. IMO if it performs anything better than your average short ram its worth the money.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 18 hp proven claim. with Password:JDM Carbon Fiber PowerChamber Intake | hondasi006 | Intake & Spacer Discussion | 262 | 08-04-2009 01:42 PM |
| AJP Ported Intake Manifold Tested Net +13WHP | F.I.A.T | Forced Induction And Nitrous | 170 | 03-24-2009 01:27 AM |
| PowerChamber | Raven07Si | California South | 3 | 03-02-2008 09:53 PM |
| AJP Ported Intake Manifold Tested... | F.I.A.T | Forced Induction And Nitrous | 137 | 12-26-2006 06:33 PM |
| Si tested by CNET | eric3621 | Civic SI | 10 | 06-16-2006 10:32 AM |