8thCivic.com

Go Back   8th Generation Honda Civic Forum > Welcome > Garage

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2008, 02:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
DrkClouD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 118
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Mugen slower that FA5??!!!

I was getting my oil changed the other day and was flippin threw a road and track. In the back , there was a section with 0-60 and 1/4 mile time with a bunch of cars on there. Thats when i noticed that that the Mugen had 5Hp more than the FA5 same tq but did 6.9 sec 0-60 and they had the FA5 @ 6.8sec!! And the 1/4 mile time Mugen 15.2 sec @ 93.4 mph FA5 15.1 sec @94 mph. Also the Mugen is 15lbs lighter. sorry if repost.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
DrkClouD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 02:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
NIGHTHAWKSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: long island
Posts: 9,579
iTrader: 12 / 100%
5hp more than the Fa5? thats the first thing that discredits anythign the magazine published....
15lbs lighter? thought that wing alone would creat 15lbs more weight, lol.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
NIGHTHAWKSI is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 02:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fhound258's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sunderland, MA
Age: 20
Posts: 478
iTrader: 0 / 0%
different divers, different condtions. people some how are able to do 14.1 on stock fg2, i can;t even come close.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
fhound258 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 02:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Clover LF King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 27
Posts: 101
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by fhound258 View Post
different divers, different condtions. people some how are able to do 14.1 on stock fg2, i can;t even come close.
That and if you see the small numbers by the figures and then reference their meaning in the description paragraph, you will see that the SI's numbers come from a comparison and the Mugen's numbers are estimated.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Clover LF King is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 02:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
VIP Member
Toys For Tots
 
Excalibur's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Converse, TX.
Age: 25
Posts: 7,278
Jeremy
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Here's a nice little vid of me at the track against my buddy's mugen. His is stock. I have i/rh/e. We both had a passenger.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Excalibur is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 04:49 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
volvo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Attleboro, MA
Age: 25
Posts: 1,576
Andrew
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by NIGHTHAWKSI View Post
5hp more than the Fa5? thats the first thing that discredits anythign the magazine published....
15lbs lighter? thought that wing alone would creat 15lbs more weight, lol.
exactly. I don't know where they got their info from, the Mugen has the SAME engine and transmission as the Si. I doubt it's lighter either, it's got more plastic on it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
volvo9 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:18 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
splew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Age: 18
Posts: 2,018
Windex
iTrader: 0 / 0%
According to Road & Track the Mugen Si is 15 pounds heavier than the standard FA5, not lighter. Road & track says the Mugen Si does 0-60 in 6.9 seconds and the standard FA5 does it in 6.8. The primary focus of the Mugen Si is handling and Looks. The Mugen Si stops 6 feet shorter from 60 and 9 feet shorter from 80, and pulls .05g more on the skid-pad and goes 1mph faster though the slalom, all thanks to better tires and suspension. Also the top speed is limited to 135 miles per hour vs. 129 for the FA5.

Last edited by splew; 05-16-2008 at 06:21 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
splew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:44 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mattsbobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Age: 33
Posts: 3,609
" I am forever!"
iTrader: 6 / 100%
I drove another 8th member's Mugen last weekend, and whereas the suspension felt great, there's no way it would beat my FG2.

That being said, it's not a fair comparison. The Mugen was basically stock, and the FG2 is heavilly bolted on.

Did I mention the Mugen's suspension felt great?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
mattsbobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:51 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
06Si_LoveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
Age: 26
Posts: 1,487
Shuzoku 4 Life
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattsbobo View Post
Did I mention the Mugen's suspension felt great?
30k great...?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
06Si_LoveR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mattsbobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Age: 33
Posts: 3,609
" I am forever!"
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by 06Si_LoveR View Post
30k great...?
Nope.

FG2: same 9K less

The Mugen was hot though, I won't lie.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
mattsbobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
TWFA5FTMFW
 
0720Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego
Age: 25
Posts: 23,023
Resident Si Sedan Hater Hater
iTrader: 9 / 100%
the kit has to add some weight.....then the wheels have to lose some weight......and there is little to no power gained from the exhaust.....so it should be fairly even.....it comes down to driver and conditions.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
0720Steve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
splew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Age: 18
Posts: 2,018
Windex
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0720Steve View Post
the kit has to add some weight.....then the wheels have to lose some weight......and there is little to no power gained from the exhaust.....so it should be fairly even.....it comes down to driver and conditions.
The mugen does wiegh 15 pounds more.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
splew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 07:03 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: princeton jct NJ
Age: 18
Posts: 87
Jason
iTrader: 0 / 0%
so who says the driver in the mugen wont be 15 pounds lighter? lol
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
wrecked is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 07:08 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mattsbobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Age: 33
Posts: 3,609
" I am forever!"
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by splew View Post
The mugen does wiegh 15 pounds more.
...and each wheel on the Mugen weighs 6.5 pounds lighter than the Si wheels.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
mattsbobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 07:15 PM   #15 (permalink)
I came I saw I conquered!
 
nycclaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ft. Gordon, GA and Cols, OH
Age: 25
Posts: 2,225
Nick
iTrader: 1 / 100%
15lbs is NOTHING in a drag race!!! stop bringing it up. there's more driver input than 15lbs!!
__________________
I WIN YOU LOSE
My car makes JUSTIN
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
nycclaye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 07:27 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
splew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Age: 18
Posts: 2,018
Windex
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycclaye View Post
15lbs is NOTHING in a drag race!!! stop bringing it up. there's more driver input than 15lbs!!
That is really the only difference on the car that would make it slower and Car And Driver and Road & Track both list the mugen as .1 seconds slower to 60mph, so apparently 15 pounds does matter, if only a little.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
splew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 07:29 PM   #17 (permalink)
I came I saw I conquered!
 
nycclaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ft. Gordon, GA and Cols, OH
Age: 25
Posts: 2,225
Nick
iTrader: 1 / 100%
so according to that logic, if I weigh 160 and my buddy weighs 175 I'll win in the quarter? That's retarded...

There's much more differences like springs, compression rates on the struts, different suspensions transfer weight differently on launching, different tires, wheels, etc...

It's not limited to saying "15lbs is the reason"....
__________________
I WIN YOU LOSE
My car makes JUSTIN
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
nycclaye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 07:57 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
splew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Age: 18
Posts: 2,018
Windex
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycclaye View Post
so according to that logic, if I weigh 160 and my buddy weighs 175 I'll win in the quarter? That's retarded...

There's much more differences like springs, compression rates on the struts, different suspensions transfer weight differently on launching, different tires, wheels, etc...

It's not limited to saying "15lbs is the reason"....
Obviously technique has some thing to do with it but these car magazines do multiple runs with multiple drivers with multiple techniques and they find the average time. So according to this the Mugen Si was on average .1 seconds slower to 60 than the standard Si.
Also I never said that 15 pounds will always make you slower. What I meant is that everything about the Mugen indicates that it should accelerate faster except the weight. The suspension is stiffer which means less rear squat and more traction for the front tires. The tires are stickier and offer more traction. The exhaust has better flow. The wheels/tires are lighter so they have less rotational inertia. All of these things should make the Mugen Si get to 60 faster. The only two performance degrading differences on the Mugen Si are the weight and the extra drag from the body kit. The drag would have little to no affect on a 0-60 time so the only thing left that would make the Mugen Si slower is the weight. As far as testing conditions and technique, since the magazines conduct a wide variety of runs with different drivers in different conditions these two factors don't affect the accelration times.

Think next time before you call my logic retarded.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
splew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 08:05 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tampa/Gainesville
Age: 23
Posts: 1,595
Jason
iTrader: 0 / 0%
the fact that the mugen is heavier than the coupe si doesn't surprise me at all. why do you think sedans usually cost more than the coupe? it's more metal on the sedan.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
AllShowNoGo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 08:09 PM   #20 (permalink)
fox
Senior Member
 
fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 237
Andrew
iTrader: 0 / 0%
sedans only cost $200 more than coupes.... it's more of the demand for each.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
fox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Traded in my RR FA5 for Mugen Revtress Introduction & Pictures 98 05-18-2008 06:34 PM
RR FA5 w/ Mugen Si grille (PIX!) SOLO8thGenSi Introduction & Pictures 96 04-25-2008 08:34 AM
Mugen FA5 visors cderalow Mid-Atlantic 2 04-23-2008 03:13 PM
So about how much slower will i get if i add this to my car!! Civic Pride Forced Induction And Nitrous 16 09-24-2007 10:17 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 PM