![]() |
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Rumor has it that Chevy is making the new SS very tuner friendly. More than likely its corked well at both ends stock, so throw'n in an intake and cat-back may yield BIG results. Not too different than what was done on the MS3.
Funny how the NA crowd is pointing to Turbo'd Si's for reference... LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Supreme Pizza!
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I did not read responses. Stock turbo motors are always above 14ish psi(on average). My SRT was 16 stock, evos are about 18 stock, sti's are about 15 stock, gti's are about 16 stock. Stock boosted motors are just built like that. Now a aftermarket kit at about 6-8 psi is considered high boost however on stock turbo motors below 20 is considered low boost.
Last edited by KingMarineM16a4; 05-12-2008 at 06:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
|
Actuall boost pressure is irrelevant to how much power a car makes. too many factors are involved when just talking about PSI. 22 PSI on one turbo can make the same power as 11 PSI on another. Trim levels, manifold designs, compression ratios, tunning, and other factors all play a significant roll in determining power levels.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() BUILD MY CITY!:http://whocares05050.myminicity.com/sec http://whocares05050.myminicity.com/ind
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
You guys are forgetting about FWD. I'm sure that car could produce 300+HP but there would be no way to get it to the wheels. If it was an AWD car then it would be better. My Altima puts down 270 and I sometimes have a hard time being able to get it all to the wheels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
STi is around 17psi for 300hp the WRX is 14.5 for its 224?hp the EVO is 19psi i wanna say |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I appreciate the responses / explinations but that still seems rediculous to designs a motor from the factory to run 21 lbs and only make 260 at the crank... Would it not make sense to engineers a motor that requires les psi from the factory to make optimum power output? It just doesnt seem right to me at all that they would do it like that
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I don't understand why it maters much, anyways. A simple reflash I'm willing to bet will put at least 280+ to the wheels. That's just how things go - turbo'd stock motors are always very de-tuned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
|
VIP Member
![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
SC61 Presison Garret Turbo
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| cobalt ss | tonyCiviCitalia | Water Cooler | 35 | 04-29-2008 05:42 PM |
| Who Has Beat A Cobalt Ss? | sdimicko | Autocross & Sanctioned Drag Racing | 91 | 07-20-2007 12:27 AM |
| Cobalt SS supercharged | Wreckless06si | Garage | 93 | 05-27-2007 01:01 AM |