8thCivic.com

Go Back   8th Generation Honda Civic Forum > Welcome > Garage

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2008, 06:04 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 178
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Thumbs up

Rumor has it that Chevy is making the new SS very tuner friendly. More than likely its corked well at both ends stock, so throw'n in an intake and cat-back may yield BIG results. Not too different than what was done on the MS3.

Funny how the NA crowd is pointing to Turbo'd Si's for reference... LOL
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Griff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:07 PM   #22 (permalink)
Supreme Pizza!
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Azusa, CA
Age: 25
Posts: 11,938
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
Rumor has it that Chevy is making the new SS very tuner friendly. More than likely its corked well at both ends stock, so throw'n in an intake and cat-back may yield BIG results. Not too different than what was done on the MS3.

Funny how the NA crowd is pointing to Turbo'd Si's for reference... LOL
I'm actually using that as a comparison because of how our cars are affected by boost compared to a car already boosted from factory.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Izzy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:21 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
KingMarineM16a4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arlington, Texas
Age: 19
Posts: 5,274
David
iTrader: 0 / 0%
I did not read responses. Stock turbo motors are always above 14ish psi(on average). My SRT was 16 stock, evos are about 18 stock, sti's are about 15 stock, gti's are about 16 stock. Stock boosted motors are just built like that. Now a aftermarket kit at about 6-8 psi is considered high boost however on stock turbo motors below 20 is considered low boost.

Last edited by KingMarineM16a4; 05-12-2008 at 06:31 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
KingMarineM16a4 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:08 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,542
Mike
iTrader: 1 / 100%
all im saying is . . . no matter WHAT the setup is 21 psi is ALOT of boost wether is stock boost or not and 260 is NOT alot of power for that kind of psi. . . especially not for a 5.7 0-60
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
mitsukaiSI is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:17 PM   #25 (permalink)
VIP Member
Toys For Tots
 
Whocares05050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SOFLA
Age: 21
Posts: 10,541
Mike
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitsukaiSI View Post
my question is why only 260 at the crank on 21 psi?
Actuall boost pressure is irrelevant to how much power a car makes. too many factors are involved when just talking about PSI. 22 PSI on one turbo can make the same power as 11 PSI on another. Trim levels, manifold designs, compression ratios, tunning, and other factors all play a significant roll in determining power levels.
__________________

BUILD MY CITY!:http://whocares05050.myminicity.com/sec http://whocares05050.myminicity.com/ind

Quote:
Originally Posted by 07mugencivic View Post
i need to go poop ...ill be back
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Whocares05050 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:19 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
nayilsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: I have to return some Video Tapes.
Posts: 6,259
iTrader: 0 / 0%
I wonder how much theyd make.....with the turbo removed
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
nayilsi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:24 PM   #27 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
iTrader: 1 / 100%
the turbo in these cars is probably the size of my digitalcamera. its like a 14b turbo from an eclipse vs an sc61' 9 pounds out of each turbo is going to produce rediculously different results
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
c_bongo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:25 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
KingMarineM16a4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arlington, Texas
Age: 19
Posts: 5,274
David
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitsukaiSI View Post
all im saying is . . . no matter WHAT the setup is 21 psi is ALOT of boost wether is stock boost or not and 260 is NOT alot of power for that kind of psi. . . especially not for a 5.7 0-60
Read Whocares reply. I agree with him. On stock F/I cars 20psi is not a lot of boost however a stock N/A car with F/I added to it even 10psi is a lot of boost.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
KingMarineM16a4 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:36 PM   #29 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Age: 24
Posts: 68
Dan
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Doesn't matter what anyone says, chevy gone done it right. 23k for a fast, tunable, well handling car. STFU and accept it!

- Dan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
DBFIU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 08:02 PM   #30 (permalink)
Member
 
Vash2940's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minnetonka
Posts: 65
Neven
iTrader: 0 / 0%
You guys are forgetting about FWD. I'm sure that car could produce 300+HP but there would be no way to get it to the wheels. If it was an AWD car then it would be better. My Altima puts down 270 and I sometimes have a hard time being able to get it all to the wheels.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Vash2940 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 08:04 PM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Robstunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 202
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzy View Post
The STi pushes 14.5PSI to get to 300hp on a 2.5L motor. Big difference from the 7-something PSI that Civics push to get some crazy numbers. I'm not a turbo guru, but I do know that most companies with turbo'd cars do run at higher PSI because they know the car can handle it.

Heck, even my Volvo could handle 2x the PSI as a boosted Civic can, but only put out 160hp and 170lb/ft at 12 PSI. LOL.

STi is around 17psi for 300hp

the WRX is 14.5 for its 224?hp

the EVO is 19psi i wanna say
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Robstunner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 08:05 PM   #32 (permalink)
Supreme Pizza!
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Azusa, CA
Age: 25
Posts: 11,938
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robstunner View Post
STi is around 17psi for 300hp

the WRX is 14.5 for its 224?hp

the EVO is 19psi i wanna say
I just googled the STi, and that's the number a few forum posts said, so I assumed it's true. Or maybe even if I searched STi, it came up with the WRX numbers?
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Izzy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 11:35 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,542
Mike
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingMarineM16a4 View Post
Read Whocares reply. I agree with him. On stock F/I cars 20psi is not a lot of boost however a stock N/A car with F/I added to it even 10psi is a lot of boost.
I appreciate the responses / explinations but that still seems rediculous to designs a motor from the factory to run 21 lbs and only make 260 at the crank... Would it not make sense to engineers a motor that requires les psi from the factory to make optimum power output? It just doesnt seem right to me at all that they would do it like that
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
mitsukaiSI is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 11:39 PM   #34 (permalink)
Member
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Age: 23
Posts: 98
iTrader: 0 / 0%
I hear that it is just as fast as the STi. I like it alot, im going to trade my Si in soon so i might get that. Just hope it dont fall apart like my Si did in 20k miles
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
I_like_cake is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 11:47 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
Toys For Tots
 
I Vtec, do you?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mn
Posts: 7,289
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitsukaiSI View Post
I appreciate the responses / explinations but that still seems rediculous to designs a motor from the factory to run 21 lbs and only make 260 at the crank... Would it not make sense to engineers a motor that requires les psi from the factory to make optimum power output? It just doesnt seem right to me at all that they would do it like that
I'm willing to bet a lot of it is due to the turbo they use. Considering it makes power from 2k all the way till redline, I don't care how much boost it's running as long as the block doesn't crack and it's making power. As it is, it's making boatloads more torque and 60 more HP than the SI. I'll take it.

I don't understand why it maters much, anyways. A simple reflash I'm willing to bet will put at least 280+ to the wheels. That's just how things go - turbo'd stock motors are always very de-tuned.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
I Vtec, do you? is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 11:51 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
06Si_LoveR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
Age: 26
Posts: 1,502
Shuzoku 4 Life
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Wow they really redefined that thing... ricey wing gone and all. Dare I say it actually looks good
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
06Si_LoveR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 12:07 AM   #37 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
BobbySi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hialeah,FL
Age: 25
Posts: 191
Robert
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by c_bongo View Post
the turbo in these cars is probably the size of my digitalcamera. its like a 14b turbo from an eclipse vs an sc61' 9 pounds out of each turbo is going to produce rediculously different results
__________________
SC61 Presison Garret Turbo
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
BobbySi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 12:08 AM   #38 (permalink)
Member
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Age: 23
Posts: 98
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Looks great and will smoke a Si no problem. Like I vtec, do you said I bet a chip will get 300+ Whp and run low 13's -high 12's for 500 bucks Ohhh yeah this is the car.. W00t
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
I_like_cake is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 12:13 AM   #39 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
BobbySi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hialeah,FL
Age: 25
Posts: 191
Robert
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_like_cake View Post
Looks great and will smoke a Si no problem. Like I vtec, do you said I bet a chip will get 300+ Whp and run low 13's -high 12's for 500 bucks Ohhh yeah this is the car.. W00t
will beat a stock Si, but not mine
__________________
SC61 Presison Garret Turbo
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
BobbySi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 12:28 AM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
greenroom1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersey
Age: 20
Posts: 151
Matt
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_like_cake View Post
I hear that it is just as fast as the STi. I like it alot, im going to trade my Si in soon so i might get that. Just hope it dont fall apart like my Si did in 20k miles
fall apart like your si? what happed to it?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
greenroom1988 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cobalt ss tonyCiviCitalia Water Cooler 35 04-29-2008 05:42 PM
Who Has Beat A Cobalt Ss? sdimicko Autocross & Sanctioned Drag Racing 91 07-20-2007 12:27 AM
Cobalt SS supercharged Wreckless06si Garage 93 05-27-2007 01:01 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 AM.