![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
F@#$ dyno numbers
![]() |
So I am thinking about trading my Si in. NO THIS IS NOT BECAUSE I DONT LIKE MY 07 ASM FG2. This is only because I am sick of having high car payments (I fully financed, no money down and no trade in). Plus I have the fever and itch to start modding out my Si------ MORE MONEY SPENT..... so before I get too involved I thought about trading my baby in for a used 04-06 WRX. I mean they already come with a turbocharged boxer engine and can be built up a hell of a lot easier and cheaper than our Sis. What you all think? Smart move or should I grudge through the payments and reap the reward of a beast civic later??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I was considering the same thing, so i called my agent to get a quote on a 06 STi and the premiums doubled compared to my '07 Si. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
F@#$ dyno numbers
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
If you trade in the honda you will get around 17-18 for it, probrably around 17 or less depending upon miles. If you buy the Subaru you will be paying the same price, maybe a little less if you get one with high miles. Your payments will stay the same, and you'll have a used car with high insurance.
Keep the Si or trade it in on a 10k car. Your payments aren't going to change much by dropping 1 or 2 k off the loan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
I had a 2002 Impreza WRX and it was a great car!
From what I remember, the transmissions were very weak (especially if you start modding) because AWD launches really workout the transmission. The MY02-03 seats were horrid (hurt my back, later upgraded MY04+). The driving position is nowhere as good as the SI, you sit high and reach low for the shifter and no armrest (necessity for me!) The insurance is VERY HIGH check this out. Quote:
If you read all that and still want a WRX, we must have the same ailment :). My advice is to find a 2006 model WRX because it was the first year they did a major overhaul to the engine by increasing displacement from 2.0L to 2.5L. This engine had huge potential because it was factory under rated and actually had huge amounts of torque (something like ~240lb/ft peak) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
F@#$ dyno numbers
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
|
My buddy just bought a used 02 WRX, he has put intake, exhaust, downpipe, up pipe, and tune on his car, he was at 230whp before he put his up pipe on and raised his boost about 2 pounds, so we are guessin he is somewhere between 240-250whp. his gas mileage isnt the best, he says between 15-17mpg. He is only 19 and full coverage on his car is like $103/month. Good luck man!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Two motors of the same, one being boosted and the other not, the n/a motor will always have better gas mileage. It's common sense really - the blower is pushing more air in and in turn requires more fuel. What I think you're thinking of is when car companies (I beleive volvo does this) is use a very fuel efficient motor and then turbo/twin turbo it to get power out of it. This can result in a motor having pretty good fuel efficienty and enough power to be drivable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
I drive a lot for my job (not a pizza delivery driver). In mixed hwy and city mileage, the Si gets me up to 28mpg. The WRX was around 25mpg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
If you really want to ditch the Si for a WRX, more power to you. Now the trick to your theory is finding someone who will pay $19K for a used Si with 30K miles when a new one is $21K. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
First... the gti gets better gas mileage stock. Second, it has way more torque so you barely have to rev the car past 2500 ever. Don't wrx's stock get like 19c 24highway? So with mods you might get what like 27 at best if it adds any mpg? But i think it runs a little more rich with mods, so then you end up getting like 22highway at best? at least that is how it is for my friends with wrx's and stis. Random other info.... in my 03 1.8t gti When I added a full turbo back exhaust my gas mileage went up like 3-5 mpg, as long as i didnt drive like an ass. My 06 Jetta GLI 2.0t Got like 15mpg city (shifting at 3-4k) and 30-33mpg highway.. So on average It seemed like I was getting 24mpg.. I felt like the 2.0t was way worse on gas than the 1.8t... |
|
|
|
|