8thCivic.com

Go Back   8th Generation Honda Civic Forum > Model Specific Civic Information > Civic SI

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2008, 05:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 955
iTrader: 0 / 0%
aerodynamics

are there any numbers on the aerodynamics/downforce our car creates. as you pick up speed does it create more downforce? what about with the hfp front lip? will it prevent lift?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
dnbsi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 05:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
Go BUCKS!
 
Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Age: 25
Posts: 807
Andy
iTrader: 4 / 100%
I highly doubt it will make much of a difference really. In fact, I bet it causes slightly more drag considering the increase in frontal surface area.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Gone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 05:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Warren Wallace Pwnz You!
 
SoCal07Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Whitter, So Cali
Age: 21
Posts: 11,750
iTrader: 1 / 100%


The spoilers might produce a few pounds, but thats it
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
SoCal07Si is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 05:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 955
iTrader: 0 / 0%
i remember a post about a race built si for autocross by a well known company and they put the front lip on theirs. i think the way the bottom part of it angles out would provide a little downforce. either way, i'm curious about the design of our car in general. how aerodynamic is it?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
dnbsi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 05:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Go BUCKS!
 
Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Age: 25
Posts: 807
Andy
iTrader: 4 / 100%
If I remember correctly, the 2006 Civic's Cd is like 0.31 or so.

I don't know if thats with the HFP kit or not (but probably not)
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Gone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 06:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 955
iTrader: 0 / 0%
yeah, it is .31 which is fairly good. i'm more curious about the downforce characteristics of it. for example the iroc z had a certain speed where it would become much more stable and planted to the road. the new gtr is designed to add more downforce the faster you go, as well as some porsches.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
dnbsi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 06:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
Supreme Pizza!
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Azusa, CA
Age: 25
Posts: 11,938
iTrader: 5 / 100%
All race cars are designed to have downforce at speed. You can't have downforce that will make the car run on the ceiling while only going 40.

I don't particularly think our cars are designed with that in mind.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Izzy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 07:16 PM   #8 (permalink)
Warren Wallace Pwnz You!
 
SoCal07Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Whitter, So Cali
Age: 21
Posts: 11,750
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzy View Post
All race cars are designed to have downforce at speed. You can't have downforce that will make the car run on the ceiling while only going 40.

I don't particularly think our cars are designed with that in mind.
Mine can
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
SoCal07Si is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 10:58 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NorCal
Age: 23
Posts: 2,123
iTrader: 1 / 100%
In order to accurately measure downforce, you'd have to put the civic in a wind tunnel. And if someone put a civic in a wind tunnel, it would probably be the Civic Hybrid to lower the Cd for increased mileage.

If you want more frontal downforce, get some kind of front splitter... anyone of them will do.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
habitat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 11:06 PM   #10 (permalink)
eXe
210whp/150tq
 
eXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 1337, MD
Age: 100
Posts: 2,079
myg0t
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnbsi View Post
i remember a post about a race built si for autocross by a well known company and they put the front lip on theirs. i think the way the bottom part of it angles out would provide a little downforce. either way, i'm curious about the design of our car in general. how aerodynamic is it?
Its pretty decent...but nothing to really boast over.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone View Post
If I remember correctly, the 2006 Civic's Cd is like 0.31 or so.

I don't know if thats with the HFP kit or not (but probably not)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dnbsi View Post
yeah, it is .31 which is fairly good. i'm more curious about the downforce characteristics of it. for example the iroc z had a certain speed where it would become much more stable and planted to the road. the new gtr is designed to add more downforce the faster you go, as well as some porsches.
. Cant compair to the porches, they have certain techniques they add to their vehicles that would out-due our downforce.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by illusionstwice View Post
if u havent seen black cars with CF hood, then u need to crawl out from under your rock. They are all OVER this damn site.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
eXe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 11:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 955
iTrader: 0 / 0%
the hybrid does actually have a significantly lower Cd
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
dnbsi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 11:30 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
TMR Net Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 292
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Roll down your windows.. there's your downforce you need..


But to be honest.. the rear spoiler does very little. But I do believe it makes the car stay straight at higher speeds.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
TMR Net Shark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 11:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NorCal
Age: 23
Posts: 2,123
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMR Net Shark View Post
Roll down your windows.. there's your downforce you need..
Nope, that's called increasing drag.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
habitat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 11:40 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
TMR Net Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 292
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by habitat View Post
Nope, that's called increasing drag.
I was kidding.. lol
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
TMR Net Shark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 03:14 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NorCal
Age: 23
Posts: 2,123
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMR Net Shark View Post
I was kidding.. lol
Just making sure... sounds like BACKforce to me anyhow
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
habitat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 08:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
TMR Net Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 292
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by habitat View Post
Just making sure... sounds like BACKforce to me anyhow
No, it's just drag.. that's all.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
TMR Net Shark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 11:40 AM   #17 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Humboldt
Posts: 48
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
All race cars are designed to have downforce at speed. You can't have downforce that will make the car run on the ceiling while only going 40.
You'd be suprised! Ever heard of Chaparral?
Quote:
The most unusual Chaparral was the 2J. In addition to a powerful 700 hp engine, and a three-speed semi automatic transmission, the back of the 2J housed two 17-inch fans driven by a 45 hp snowmobile engine. The purpose of the fans was to 'suck' air from under the car and propel it out the back. This gave the car tremendous gripping power and enabled greater maneuverability at all speeds, which cannot be achieved by simpler aerodynamic devices such as diffusers and wings. Since it created the same amount of vacuum under the car at all speeds, down-force did not decrease at lower speeds. With other aerodynamic devices, down-force decreases as the car slows down or achieves too much of a slip angle, both of which were not problems for the 'sucker car'. It also had ground effect skirts to keep air from leaking in, a technology that would appear in Formula One several years later. The 2J competed in the CanAm series and often qualified at least a couple of seconds quicker than the next fastest car, but was not a success because it was plagued with mechanical problems. It ran for only one racing season in 1970 as its technology was quickly outlawed by the SCCA (even though it was approved by the SCCA prior to the car's first race). The SCCA succumbed to pressure from other teams, McLaren in particular, who argued that the fans constituted 'movable aerodynamic devices' which were outlawed by the international sanctioning body, FIA. There were also complaints from other drivers saying that whenever they drove behind it the fans would throw stones at their cars. McLaren argued that if the 2J was not outlawed, it would likely kill the CanAm series by totally dominating it - ironically, something McLaren had been doing for years[1]. A similar suction fan was used in Formula 1 eight years later for the 1978 Swedish Grand Prix, by the Brabham BT46B but was banned soon after. The 2J is the other Chaparral to appear in Gran Turismo 4.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
humboldt1498 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 11:46 AM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fiji-blew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Age: 23
Posts: 603
iTrader: 1 / 100%
^^
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
fiji-blew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 11:58 AM   #19 (permalink)
Your shades suck :P
 
xheartcore_boyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middle east,Qatar
Age: 19
Posts: 1,576
Addy
iTrader: 0 / 0%
what is the benefit of down force ?


note:nice enough to tell? no nerdy wiki please.

Last edited by xheartcore_boyx; 05-11-2008 at 12:21 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
xheartcore_boyx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 12:05 PM   #20 (permalink)
Go BUCKS!
 
Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Age: 25
Posts: 807
Andy
iTrader: 4 / 100%
To put it in really laymans terms, think of it as the force of the wind going over a particular part of the car that pushes it down into the ground.

Does that help?


Quote:
Originally Posted by dnbsi View Post
the hybrid does actually have a significantly lower Cd
I don't think 0.27 is significantly better than the normal civic's 0.31
__________________

Last edited by Gone; 05-11-2008 at 12:06 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Gone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HFP lip kit and aerodynamics? dnbsi Civic SI 1 10-21-2007 10:06 PM
Larger wing=Better aerodynamics? dannyboy's06Si Inside and Out 35 07-31-2006 11:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
copyright 8thcivic.com - all rights reserved