![]() |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Drop Babies not Bombs
![]() |
yah thats what im probly gonna get.
__________________
My Build-Thread http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/car-b...-build-up.html http://www.myspace.com/demisedgabe5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Well, all intakes for the most part seem to lose at least a tiny bit of HP down low. It's just with the K&N, it loses it for a while, and then for another few K rpms it just breaks even, and then it finally gains some. Seems worthless to me.
Lemme try and dig up the dyno Edit- Here it is ![]() From 4000-6250ish RPMs, it's basically losing power. From 4000-5800ish RPMs, it's losing a considerable amount (12ish WHP I'd say). From 6250ish-7250ish it basically makes none and gains none. From 7250-redline, it gains a good amount. For such a small amount of a range with gains, compared to how big of a range where it's lost/nothing is made, I'd say this intake is good for nothing more than sound. Compare it to the Fujita SRI (best IMO): ![]() From about 2.5k-4k RPMs, it loses a bit of HP. From then on, it pretty much gains HP all the way till redline (at one or two spots it's about even with stock). Last edited by I Vtec, do you?; 05-13-2008 at 12:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Member
|
Quote:
When you mod a car N/A motor for more power, you will lose power down low or up top but will gain on the other. So if its tuned to make power down low you will lose out at the top, if you tune for power up top you lose down low. Is it worth it? Yes, more power up top is better then down low. Who tracks under 6k rpms? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
So for a newby who barely gets his Si over 5k RPM is something like CAI worth the money? I didn't even know what CAI meant until last night. I heard someone mention that the sound of the engine is better with one? I feel ashamed that I have an Si but don't know anything about cars and mods.
<-- nerdy computer programmer |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The previous versions of the K&N typhoon suffered from massive heatsoak. Shield or not, the filter placement is in the back of the engine bay where hot air gets trapped in slow driving conditions. If you're honestly concerned about hydrolock, wait for the Comptech Icebox or get an K&N drop-in. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() The bumper covers the open area in front and below the filter. I am not refuting your claim that hydrolock can occur - only that it's not as widespread an occurence as your posts suggest. If you're inclined to debate otherwise, might I suggest you reference at least 5 threads on this forum where hydrolocking occured from a properly installed CAI. Last edited by Design; 05-13-2008 at 04:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
VIP Member
|
Quote:
There have been 2 versions of the K&N for the SI.... the one posted in the V2, the newest one... it was on my car... the car has greddy EVO II, DCRH, and the k&N...the before chart was with every thing else the same and the the K&N drop in instead of the typhoon... I still think it was worth it... I loves muh intake ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Injen CAI v. K&N Typhoon | Southpaw3612 | Bolt-Ons And All-Motor | 2 | 02-23-2008 01:17 AM |
| All Sorts of CAI/SRI questions for an SI (K&N Typhoon SRI or Injen CAI?) | MetalTark | Bolt-Ons And All-Motor | 2 | 04-10-2007 09:14 PM |