![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
![]() Check it out: http://www.tein.com/ti/b14.html RIDE HEIGHT FRONT Approx. Height Adjust Range mm inch Max/Min(mm/inch) -39 -1.54 -33.0 / -1.3 to -55.0 / -2.17 REAR Approx. Height Adjust Range mm inch Max/Min(mm/inch) -36 -1.42 -12.0 / -0.47 to -46.0 / -1.81 SPRING FRONT SPRING RATE / PART No. Replacement Availability kgf/mm lbs/in Part # Max/Min(kgf/mm-lbs/in) 6 340LBS SY060-01225 - REAR SPRING RATE / PART No. Replacement Availability kgf/mm lbs/in Part # Max/Min(kgf/mm-lbs/in) 7 390LBS - - / 0 to - / 0 Based on this info, the new civic has good weight distribution. it was not nessacery to put to heavy springs in the rear to make the car rotate. I cant wait, looks good too! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
OK guys, To be honest, those rates aren't *that* aggressive especially considering the weight of the car (especially the Si)... However, the motion ratios are much improved on the new 2006 Civic, they are now basically 1:1 so a 390 lb./in. spring rate is going to act like 390 lb./in; at least relative to autocrossing they aren't stiff enough. As for weight distribution, most FWD cars are carrying 59-62% of their weight over the front wheels... The new 2006 Civic is no exception. It's polar moment is improved, and the fast steering ratio helps that along, but you'll never see a FWD car sporting a 50-55% front weight bias, and you wouldn't want to either! Traction coming off corners would suck. The real question to ask is: Has anyone cornerweighted a bone stock 2006 yet though? AND Since we're on the topic, what is the rate of the OEM Si spring? I have an LX Coupe that since I'm running in Stock, I can't change the OEM springs. But the Si fronts are 17% stiffer and the rears are 14% stiffer. If I can get hold of those numbers, I can figure out what rates my LX Coupe has. Anthony "Mario" Crea |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|