![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
the infamous question: CAI or SRI?
Once again I will ask what probably hundreds, if not thousands, of people asked on forums. What is a better choice? The CAI or the SRI?
From most of the information that I have gathered, i believe that the Cold Air Intake can take in colder air, thus allowing the engine to breath better oxygen. Also hear that the CAI is more for increasing power (or whatever little gain it gets) on the High RPMs and not so much for the Lows, and mids. At the expense of having a longer piping to get colder air, i heard that there is a lag in the throttle response for the CAI under around 3k RPMs. For the Short Ram intake, i believe that its a shorter piping allowing for a better air velocity but at the same time, not being able to suck in cold air. I also hear that you get gains in the Mids, but not so much on the Highs. So if there is any other information I am missing on this, please feel free to give your opinion on this. |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
After checking out the research that X has done (way too many posts to reference), I am inclined to use either stock or DIY x-intake (DIY in engine section).
The aftermarket intakes available seem to interfere with the MAF sensor, which I suspect is what causes the lag in throttle response. More importantly, x found that his car ran a lot leaner when using an aftermarket intake, but with increased power above 6500 or so. His x-intake design taps into high-end power while not messing up air fuel ratios. The CAI has access to colder air generally, and any gains will be due to the increased air density. That being said, I have been using an SRI the past couple months. It sounds pretty good, but I haven't taken the car to a dyno. I expect to have my custom intake (x design) made by the end of the week, otherwise I would go back to stock until I had it completed. It is my opinion that most (if not all) aftermarket intakes for the Si are not properly designed. If I had done my research before I bought the SRI, I would not have bought it. |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
You can use nearly any aftermarket intake (SRI or CAI) with an Apexi filter. The benefit of the x-intake design is to not jack up air/fuel ratios. Plus I think it ends up being cheaper. Plus it's always better to do something yourself, even if it's not.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
™ |
Search next time please.
__________________
![]() search · FAQ · rules · report bad post · learn how to spell Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| the infamous Greddy stalling issues... | 07CivicSiRacer | Forced Induction And Nitrous | 21 | 03-24-2008 12:27 PM |
| not sure if this is the infamous grind... | SIcivic07 | Mechanical Problems & Technical Chat | 13 | 12-19-2007 11:55 AM |
| All Sorts of CAI/SRI questions for an SI (K&N Typhoon SRI or Injen CAI?) | MetalTark | Bolt-Ons And All-Motor | 2 | 04-10-2007 09:14 PM |