![]() |
|
|
|
#81 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() You totally read my mind. I would also like to know the diff. in power gains if I have foglights compared to cutting out the hole and putting a mesh grill or something. Anyway, much props to T1R for coming out with something besides a filter on a stick. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Stock pic below(borrowed from an 8thCivic member) ![]() Last edited by cornerstrike; 05-02-2008 at 07:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
lol right?!?! They are mostly full of shit and its just marketing. If it were true then we would have a truely productive intake system on the a martket instead of the junk we have available. Thats why an intake is really the last thing on my list just because they seem like a waste of money right now
Last edited by HTX; 05-02-2008 at 07:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 (permalink) | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Air induction's R&D does not mean it must go through dyno. I work at a company where we make OE air management system such as intake inlets, resonators, filter box, etc and we did not use dyno to present to the manufactures. Instead, we have a team of test techs, engineers and CAD/FEA guys to meet their expectation and guidelines. We used prototypes on pre production vehicles to test for durability. Just a heads up .. again, i think their product appears to be legitimate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by HTX; 05-02-2008 at 09:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 (permalink) |
|
Kill Your Self Krew
|
cant wait for a dyno. see how this intake works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
good joey!!!!!!if there is a group buy i might be one of the people on the list.....ive been waiting for this for a while now........and i keep checking the site but it was still under construction....and now that it is out im geting one for sure!!
but one question how would u say this compares with the x-intake?????? i know u guys havent dynoed it and lots of people are asking, but if u can please let me know how it stands up against the x-intake. thanks joey |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 (permalink) |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() |
Please everyone, I want you all to consider the fact that it is impossible to test a ram air system on a dyno. It cannot be done plain and simple. People need to stop asking for dyno info.
The reason you cannot test on a dyno is because there is no way to simulate the flow of air entering the scoop. Yes, I have heard of people suggesting weed blowers and large fans, but that is just ludicrous. There is no way to get the same amount of air flowing in a controlled state as would happen while driving at speed. As speed increase on the road, the velocity of the car increases commensurately. There is increased air pressure as well. The only way that one could try and simulate the effects of rammed air into an intake would be to go to a wind tunnel and simulate roads speeds while testing manifold pressure changes. Manifold pressure should be increasing with velocity. Better still would be a moving plane wind tunnel like those that are used in Formula 1. These are the most realistic ways to test aerodynamic values and pressures of any car. Unfortunately, accessing one of these would require you to be friends with Ron Dennis or someone at Ferrari. Since the rammed air and enlarged airbox are increasing the cubic feet per minute of air moving into the intake, pressure will increase to the point of even making positive boost. That will be boost above one atmosphere or 14.696 psi. Yes, a properly designed ram air system will give a supercharging effect. Here is a snippet from an article I found that states that they cannot test the ram air on a dyno, but rather it is tested while driving: August 29, 2005. We tested the complete High Velocity System with Ram Air Box in a car on the road today. This test was to measure the effects of the air intake system with ram air while driving, since this cannot be tested on a chassis dyno. Our test car was a completly stock 05 Mustang GT. The test consisted of accelerating the car from 50 to 100mph in 3rd gear (roughly 3000 to 5850 rpm) while logging the data using a Diablo Predator. Our standard 80mm mass air sensor was used and there were no changes to the program in the car. The outside air temperature during the test was 67° and altitude was 3800ft. Here are the results. Western MotorsportS (WMS) 2005 Mustang High Velocity Intake System Another thing to consider is air density. Rammed air is cooler, thus the air is denser. Generally, a 10 degree drop in air temperature is worth about 2 hp. Most good ram air systems see about a 40 degree drop in temperature over systems drawing in air from under the hood. Some drawing air in the cowl see even greater temperature drops. With all this said, a ram air system cannot be tested on a chassis dyno. There are too many parameters to measure that cannot be simulated. The best way to test cars with ram air is to actually drive them and use some type of instrumentation like a G-tech or the like. I also just saw a program on Speed Channel about the MSD Dashhawk. It can record 0-60 and quarter mile times. This is a better assessment of performance gains than a dyno.
__________________
Last edited by NitrousG35; 05-03-2008 at 11:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 (permalink) |
|
Kill Your Self Krew
|
a dyno is still needed.
|
|
|
|