![]() |
|
|
|
#301 (permalink) | |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
I threw this out as something that we could look into. I am glad for others that they have more choices now. A lot of people don't want to have to deal with fabricating something. I am interested in doing that.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#302 (permalink) | |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#303 (permalink) |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Good point. Automakers have the ability to measure horsepower in a windtunnel or through on-board measuring devices at speed. For us, it would be hard to see which one makes the most power. The only way to test it out would be to do a comparison with a stock airbox, an aftermarket intake and a ram air intake at a track, either at a dragstrip or road course.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#304 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#305 (permalink) |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Yeah, I forgot about that. It is about the only affordable on-board device that we could use. Plus, they work extremely well. For sure it could be used to test out different setups.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#307 (permalink) |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
I have no idea what you are trying to say. Who's laughing? What's with the genius comment? Is that directed towards me or towards X factor?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#309 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Nitrous, does this do it for you?
Type One Racing :: Intake & Exhaust :: CSX (FD2) :: T1R Carbon intake system - Acura CSX 06-08 FD2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#310 (permalink) | |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#311 (permalink) |
|
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
|
How would you do that with the TR1 intake?
__________________
Waking up dead inside of my head will never never do, there is no med, no medicine to take. I've had a chance to be insane, asylum from the falling rain. I’ve had a chance to break. |
|
|
|
|
|
#312 (permalink) |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Paul, where the inlet tube is, which could be directed downwards towards the front, I would instead either use that tube and make a 90 degree turn or put a silicone tube with a 90 bend in it and attach to a duct on the firewall.
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#313 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
IDK how you would do that, Id just keep it in the bumper area for two reasons, one, I honestly think you would get more pressure coming directly from the front of the car verses in the cowl area, and second, I already cut the hole out of the fog light cover hehe, But I really like that T1r intake. My credit card is hoping its not too expensive hehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#314 (permalink) | |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
This is a tough one to answer w/o having aero numbers and pressure readouts at the bumper inlet and cowl. Most race cars that are front engined draw air in from the cowl area. Chevrolet found the pressure higher in the cowl area than in the intake area. We do know both areas are great to draw air into. For me, the simplicity of the connection to the cowl would be a plus over routing down. Also, the tubing would be straight and shorter.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#315 (permalink) | |
|
Louder than 4 F404-GE-400
|
Quote:
I'm starting to think you are taking the cowl induction thing a little to far. There has got to be a reason why car manufactures don't use cowl induction any more. They always use an inlet at the front of the car to get the ram air effect. Corvette, Viper, SLR all use a ram air inlet at the front of the car. Its 2008 not 1968. The reason NASCAR still does it is because it is a rule not because its the most efficient means of sucking in air.
__________________
Waking up dead inside of my head will never never do, there is no med, no medicine to take. I've had a chance to be insane, asylum from the falling rain. I’ve had a chance to break. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#316 (permalink) | |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
I disagree with your assessment that it is not the most efficient means of drawing air in. Quite the contrary. Anytime you have a duct at the front of a racecar, it will create additional drag. Also, any debris on the track will be sucked up into the intake. With cowl induction, you get air coming at a high velocity w/o any drag issues or sucking any debris into the motor. I am not sure where you get that 180 degree bend. Look at the picture: The air inlet is on the side of the box. How hard would it be to just make the tubing go backwards rather than downwards? If the cowl area wasn't a good area for air induction, all the car manufacturers would not be using as the source for ventilation in their cars. They would be pulling it from the fenderwell or front of the car if it was that much superior.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#318 (permalink) | |
|
Mr. Cowl Induction
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: To Infiniti and beyond...
Posts: 8,916
Wild VTEC'n Bill
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|