![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
In Review: Injen SRI
So, this past Tuesday, I installed an Injen SRI on my SI coupe. This was to be the car's very first mod. The install was fairly easy, aside from losing a fair amount of coolant when doing the coolant line bypass (doh). The rubber elbow was also a tad tricky and required some fidgeting to orient it properly while still aligning the vibra-mount.
In fact, the toughest part was the removal of the stock airbox (MAN that thing is huge). However, after only 2 days with the product installed, I have to say that I'm not very impressed. The darn thing keeps throwing a CEL for reasons unkown - had my install looked over profusely by a friend (who is also a mechanic). By no means was I expecting massive horsepower gains, or even much of a difference at all - but if anything, the car feels more sluggish at lower RPMs. This is only very noticeable because if you're like me and drive in an urban setting, you spend most of your time right around said RPMs. As for the sound - well, I'm half and half on this one. On one hand, the engine sounds much throatier and is more audible when you apply decent pressure on the pedal. On the other hand, because the filter sits so close to the firewall, you hear that nasty sucking, tin-can hissing noise whenever you give it a little gas. It quickly gets drowned out, but it's still somewhat annoying to listen to (had several friends ask me what was broken in my car lol). I much prefer the sound of the car with the stock airbox. If anything I will be taking it off and replacing it with the stock airbox this weekend and holding off in the event that I decide to get a CAI. To be completely honest, stock-engine Si for the win. In the end it seems like much more of a ricey-mod, for those that want a quick sound change and don't have the ability to install a CAI. Overall Rating: 5/10 Last edited by b.rock; 02-14-2008 at 01:29 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Is that what causes the CEL? Makes sense I suppose. However, seems a bit odd in the event that if something was actually wrong with my engine/install I wouldn't even think anything of it, brushing it aside as the MAF sensor being silly.
As for the heat bog, there's no way it's entirely due to heat bog. I live in Canada and the sluggish-ness is there all the way up to the running range of the temp gauge. Heat bog when I first start driving and it's -8 Celsius outside? Doubt it. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: tehインターウェブ
Age: 29
Posts: 4,681
Resident Si Sedan Hater
iTrader: 6 / 100%
|
No I had a Weapon R SRI, but never tripped up the CEL. Other people have had the CEL with Injen though.
If it's not heat bog, the other possibility (I was about to write in the initial post but got lazy) is that it's so rich at idle that it drowns out the engine with fuel, and when applying the throttle it takes a little while for the mixture to go back to more normal levels. If you notice the RPM dipping it's probably doing that for the same reason. With a straight-through MAF housing, it detects a lot more air than compared to the stock MAF. To compensate, it puts in a lot more fuel. But because the air mass didn't change (only the MAF housing), it makes the mixture way too rich. That's the best explanation I can offer for that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I quite enjoy the twitchyness of the k20 at lower RPMs and it seems to be softened by the SRI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I had the same problem with my short air but it was weird. The cell came on at different times. I drove with it for the first few days and it came on within ~100 miles. After the reset, it came on at about 1000 miles then again somewhere at 1500 miles a month later. I gave it to my buddy and after going off the first 50 miles, no cell since.
The intake must hate my car. *was it worth it? Maybe not. I would suggest paying extra for the CAI. Last edited by Nexx; 02-15-2008 at 12:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Standard procedure for any sort of modifcation , maintenance or more. Honda Techs will also do this and that is remove the negative battery cable. This is for safety as well for the ECU to be reset so it will adapt more quickly to the new part.
Make sure you have your radio codes handy. Also these kind of threads really make it a hard choice for what intake to go with. Some say they love their SRI/CAI and some just dont like it. I just had my k&n drop in for a few days and didnt notice much , interestingly swapping back to the oem filter and it almost felt more powerful. Probably just my mind playing tricks. But either way the stock intake box is certainly going to be well designed. But we do want more power and at what cost is up to us. I hope someone does come out with a quality high flow intake that works well with the car at all angles and doesnt cost an arm and a leg. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Injen SRI? or Fujita SRI? | cminbust6 | Bolt-Ons And All-Motor | 6 | 11-17-2007 01:28 AM |
| All Sorts of CAI/SRI questions for an SI (K&N Typhoon SRI or Injen CAI?) | MetalTark | Bolt-Ons And All-Motor | 2 | 04-10-2007 09:14 PM |
| Injen CAI or Injen SRI for 06 Si | kautionxboi | Bolt-Ons And All-Motor | 4 | 10-29-2006 02:55 AM |