![]() |
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
Excalibur, In my opinion it is because radials work best at their prescribed pressure. It's not a slick that gets a softer sidewall with less pressure. This notion that 20psi gives more traction is beyond me. At this low pressure the tire cups and looses contact patch, which means less traction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have no idea. sorry, i'm not a bmw fan. EDIT: just checked on Wikipedia, it looks like that M3 was "1992-1999 E36" |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() and look at me like I'm stupid. Then they go ![]() when they lose to me. My front tires only need enough flat contact to the ground for a good launch. Notice how I can still pull a 2.1 60' with 45psi in the fronts. The main reason why I set the fronts to 45psi is for faster acceleration, better top end, to save gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Honestly, I don't know. I'm still experimenting
![]() I would said, just set your fronts to a certain psi that you feel comfortable with and try launching at different rpm. Get as close to getting wheel spin as you can without actually spinning your wheels. Your tires will screech a little bit, but that's ok, as long as you don't start spinning like crazy.Last edited by Bboy_Burst; 04-29-2008 at 02:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Was suppose to dyno on 4/29, but the dyno guy was in the hospital so i had to reschedule for 5/3. will update with results.
EDIT: They reschedule me again Now its going to be on 5/6. If I don't get to dyno that day, then taking my money somewhere else.Last edited by Bboy_Burst; 05-04-2008 at 02:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Did you do any weight reduction...that mph is way up there. Track must be down hill...lol...for only a custom made intake and race header...the spacer isn't going to help that much.
not trying to hate...just strange. When I had the same mods I ran a 14.7@95mph with a 2.2 60ft. I know conditions are different there...low 50's at night versus the mid 70's I was in here in San Antonio...I also know the track in Sacramento is 100 ft in elevation. The track here in San Antonio is 625ft. San Antonio Raceway Sacramento Raceway And correction doesn't bring my time down any... .0013 |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Hmmm.... Well, I ran consistent 14.5 - 14.6 STOCK, with 14.4 being my best. I ran at 2 different track and the times were consistent. Tracks are: Infineon Raceway & Sacramento Raceway. If my STOCK car is faster than your MOD car, then it must be the elevation. I don't know, I've beat many rsx-s(with mods) and Si(with mods) when I was stock. I've seen Si's barely breaking into 14s, leaving me scratching my head saying "it is really that hard to run 14s ??" Last edited by Bboy_Burst; 05-05-2008 at 03:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Or maybe I'm just doing something wrong while shifting. I feel like I have to leave the gas down as I shift...if I don't, it usually has that drive by wire hesitation between 2nd and 3rd if I don't do that. |
|
|
|
|