![]() |
|
|
|
#622 (permalink) | |
|
8thcivic Sponsor
|
Quote:
I might have a ride for next year...I really don't want to and can't justify to the fiance ANOTHER new car... Basically were talikingTires Shocks Alignments Anything else?
__________________
BUY MY CIVIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#624 (permalink) |
|
8thcivic Sponsor
|
Scca.org has the Rules..
__________________
BUY MY CIVIC |
|
|
|
|
|
#625 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Think a set of Kumho extsa SPT will do me fine? Or should i crank out the extra 80$ for kumho MX/ bf goodrich sport. Last edited by friedk; 02-17-2008 at 12:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#626 (permalink) | |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ft. Gordon, GA and Cols, OH
Age: 25
Posts: 2,600
Nick
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
__________________
[center] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#627 (permalink) |
|
8thcivic Sponsor
|
No, there not...
a) lateral braces, for the purpose of providing lateral rigidity only b) these braces would only mount directly between suspension points, upper left to upper right, or lower left to lower right. No additional mounting points. c) Attachment on either side would provide no "significant" chassis stiffening in other than lateral dimensions. d) No plating, boxing or triangulation through multiple attachment points. Thats the key multiple attachment points, more than 2 and it is straight to modified. So if you had a 3 point strut tower bar it is illegal..Or if it has more than 2 mounting locations, you could run latter work up and down the underside of the car as long as it only has two mounting points and mounts in stock locations, although the benifit comes from tirangulation, so I don't think it would be benifical...
__________________
BUY MY CIVIC |
|
|
|
|
|
#628 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ft. Gordon, GA and Cols, OH
Age: 25
Posts: 2,600
Nick
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
ok, well then the event officials were right. Mine qualify for STS then. All the braces I have are LATERAL!! Hell, they only offer lateral braces for our cars right now unless you have em custom made.
__________________
[center] |
|
|
|
|
|
#629 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I'm pretty sure honda93 wouldn't be mistaken about the autox rules. ![]() Last edited by friedk; 02-18-2008 at 12:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#630 (permalink) | |
|
8thcivic Sponsor
|
Quote:
"These braces would only mount directly between suspension points, upper left to upper right, or lower left to lower right. No additional mounting points. " Look the general rule of thumb is if it doesn't say you can then you can't!!
__________________
BUY MY CIVIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#631 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
From the SCCA's own rulebook regarding STS, STX or STU (All Street Touring). I highlighted and boldfaced the parts of the ruling which appear to be confusing you.
14.8.H Suspension Strut bars are permitted with all types of suspension. Strut bars may be mounted only transversely across the car from upper right to upper left suspension mounting point and from lower right to lower left suspension mounting point. No other configuration is permitted. Additional holes may be drilled for mounting bolts. Only bolt-on attachment is permitted. Interior trim panels may be modified to allow installation of strut bars. Holes or slots may be no larger than necessary and may serve no other purpose. This does not permit any modifications to the frame or unibody beyond the allowed mounting holes. In other words, only the upper or lower strut bars are allowed. Anything else (those butterfly or H-Braces are a no-no) and must either come off for you to remain legal in STX or you go to DSP or beyond. Anthony "Mario" Crea NNJR-SCCA |
|
|
|
|
|
#632 (permalink) | |||
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ft. Gordon, GA and Cols, OH
Age: 25
Posts: 2,600
Nick
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I hate how one person can "interpret" the law or lack thereof, one way and another person another way. I'm military... Just say wtf I can and can't do dammit!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() So i'll stay in that class now. STX FTMFW ![]() ![]()
__________________
[center] |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#633 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Would you guys suggest I get a set of kumho SPTs, MXs, or BF goodrich g-force sports(current tires are crap)? the SPT are a good 80$ total the the MX of the bf goodrich tires. Is it worth it for the slightly improved performance? They all have pretty good reviews when it comes to dry handling and tire wear. I just can't justify having a set of extra wheels for some R compounds. Last edited by friedk; 02-18-2008 at 12:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#634 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ft. Gordon, GA and Cols, OH
Age: 25
Posts: 2,600
Nick
iTrader: 1 / 100%
|
^^^^I've got the BF Goodrich G-Force T/A KDW2's on mine now.... Loud for the road but about the same as my previous Toyo Proxes and I love em. Kick ass Grip!!!
__________________
[center] |
|
|
|
|
|
#635 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#638 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
"stock" Si's are GS, but depending on how you updated them you are kicked to STX because of the LSD. Si's are not eligible for STS class. |
|
|
|
|