![]() |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I had read somewhere that the '06 Si has an engine balancer or something of that nature, which is why it is rated at 197 instead of 205. I don't recall exactly what it is, but the article did say that it limits engine movement; however, it also restricts a small amount of hp. I wouldn't think that it really restricts hp all that much. It's probably just Honda/Acura's way of making the potential RSX-S buyers believe that it's worth paying the extra $$ for the Acura.
The RXS-S doesn't utilize this stock engine balancer feature in order to free up a few extra horse. This way, people can justify spending 2-3K more for the possible 8 extra horse and leather seats, I guess?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
i watched two 05-06 type s's running around the same times as me at dragway 42 and i had the quicker times. They were asking me on launch techniques. I ran 14.9's all night and they were anywhere from 15.1-15.6
the bottom line is.....it's a drivers race. who cares what clubrsx says. clubsi + clubrsx = :gaygiggle |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mugen Dominator Sedan + Mugen Civic Super Charger, faster than SI Sedan | Tikolx333 | Garage | 15 | 07-03-2008 11:55 AM |
| server issues | webby | 8thcivic.com Site News | 25 | 09-27-2006 05:33 PM |
| What's faster 0-60 | SapphireRaven | Garage | 6 | 07-02-2006 02:49 PM |
| Who's right, and who's wrong!? !@#$% | ScorchedHands | Civic SI | 24 | 03-27-2006 05:29 AM |