05-09-2010, 10:06 PM
|
#189 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly, MA
Age: 28
Posts: 17,663
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 06CivEXJon
Lucky bastard.
|
Spoke with the owner of Maddad the other day and it sounds like these exhausts are just about ready for full production.
___________
Got my car tuned yesterday (Open Source) by BrenTuning. Extremely happy with the results... below is an excerpt from a post the tuner made on another forum. It should help clear up a couple things concerning the #s.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BG @ BrenTuning
Stock car at 25k with nothing crazy on it other then 3" catted maddad prototype turboback, stock intake and 25k old filter etc.
Runs were done within 2 minutes of each other, on same strip of road. Only difference is we started the stock run sooner so the lines draw sooner. There are no low end losses.
Notes: stock map with a turboback, had a heavy flat spot between 3-4k rpms, pulled 2 degrees of timing globally - and peaked out at 16.25 pounds of boost. (map calls for 13.5-14 depending on rpm)
Tuned map at 20.5psi, 10.8 afr, and conservative advance. It made lots of power with the cam timing changes.
Large gains everywhere!
Stock vs. Tuned

|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phalanx
This was my car... more than happy with Brens work. Im sure Ill be back soon. Already have my head spinning about where to go next, haha.
Heres the dyno pulls from when I got the turboback installed:
Things to note is that the above is the difference from bone stock to 3" tirboback + cobb stage 2 map, gains of 20whp and 70wtq.
With Brens tune, the baseline was the stock tune + 3" turboback vs 3" turboback+brentune, gains of 45whp and 70wtq
While the final numbers are roughly the same, keeping in mind that there are variences in the way data was gathered, its still safe to say that the overall gains from bone stock to 3" turboback+brentune are actually more than 40hp/70tq.... in otherwords, nothing but a nice big on my face
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BG @ BrenTuning
Just realized something.
Your graph says stock map and stock exhaust. Our delta was from exhaust + stock (higher delta then stock exhaust) to exhaust + tune.
With your exhaust I'd expect to pick up a good 25whp untuned, let alone the flow letting it peak 16.2 psi that the stock exhaust wouldn't do.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phalanx
Thats exactly what I was trying to say with my previous post, haha. Even though the peak #s are similar, I know that the gains were more than that because we arent seeing the delta from stock+stock map to turboback+stock map.
Perfect example of why dynos are good to see what gains were made and where they were made and not for trying to actually read peak #s
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BG @ BrenTuning
I looked quickly at your graph and assumed it was tuned vs not tuned with exhaust on it. That means the delta is MUCH greater
|
Last edited by Phalanx; 05-11-2010 at 06:24 PM.
|
|
|