Did I claim all I posted was accurate? Did I miss something?
I'm just saying that there are two sides to the argument, and it's a damn shame if smoking is banned in places because of side effects it does not cause.
Quote:
|
I can't find that quote in your reference.
|
That's from the episode, watch it.
Quote:
|
I didn't even bother reading this article. It's put together by a group with a pro-smoking agenda.
|
So you should only read things that are put together by the side that already supports your conclusion? Awesome.
Quote:
|
Who's talking about sticking guns in people's faces?
|
That is what you are doing every time a new law is passed.
Quote:
|
The EPA has concluded from peer-reviewed studies
|
How many of those use the study that was thrown out as a reference?
Quote:
|
If their actions are effecting our health and lives, then yes, we do have every right to tell them to stop smoking.
|
You driving puts me at risk. I demand you stop driving.
Do you really need a nanny to watch out for you and control other people? If you do not like the smoke somewhere,
leave.
If it really was that dangerous, then you would
run from anyone with a cigarette. If you don't, then you don't believe what you say.