View Single Post
Old 04-22-2008, 08:16 PM   #204 (permalink)
supacharged
Junior Member
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by COMplex View Post
Umm... Not to rain on anyone's parade, but 272 > 269.

Also, if I recall correctly, he stated that he sees 7psi on his stage 1. I see 6psi with a smaller pulley, and was only peaking 4psi on stage 1. That alone is the biggest problem I have with the altitude affecting performance.

Yes my numbers are corrected for altitude. Basically, if you take my car as it currently sits, it should make the exact same power numbers at sea level. Although with the smaller pulley, I will likely see an increase in boost pressure at a lower altitude making for even higher numbers at sea level.

If someone wants to pay to trailer my car to California and back to Colorado I will do it to prove that point since there are still a vast number of people who do not understand horsepower numbers, altitudes effects and differences.

So by all accounts, I still make the most whp from a Comptech S/C on this forum. I hate to 'brag' or be a dick about it, but it is what is is. Let's not make false claims.

hmmm well in a way you are right, yeah if everyone was at sea level and did a dyno you would make the most. im just saying in everyones current location where they drive my car is making the most power. not trying to rain on the parade or anything i think its great you got your car that high for being in colorado and would love to see the numbers if you were in a dif location
supacharged is offline   Reply With Quote